• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    16 hours ago

    From a Facebook post I made on February 17th:

    There are giant AI data firms that promise they can go through massive troves of data and pull out general and specific information from them. Information that is actionable and accurate. Give it 6 million data points and it’ll find all the links and organize them for you and unmask hidden details that aren’t visible to the naked eye.

    Not one of those companies is stepping up to go through the publicly released Epstein files.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This is what I find crazy. Where are the AI bros chewing through the Epstein files?

      • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I would be shocked if someone hasn’t shoved them into a local model somewhere, but all the big ones would filter them to death with content restrictions

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We wouldn’t want that tbh. Justice needs to be precise and backed up by tangible facts

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can use the results of the AI analysis to identify people and then use that to do a proper investigation. Right now none of that is happening. No speculation. No tangibles. No investigation. No indictment.

        Trying to unmask people is a step in the right direction.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Also don’t use dna tests or chemical analysis. It’s invisible hocus pocus and can be wrong! And woe if someone that fucks and tortures kids regularly is wrongly accused of raping kids and running their child minds no that would be awful