• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This line of thought goes all the way back to NT, and even then IBM would have some comments.

    DOS was the last one they built, and they made a really decent GUI for it before they switched to NT.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      And they still haven’t even finished making PowerShell anywhere near as functional as Bash or any other Linux shell environment. First version of PowerShell came out exactly 10 years after the first version of NT.

      I don’t outright hate PowerShell but it’s clearly a hacky afterthought after realizing Linux was eating their lunch in the server space via quick rollouts to thousands of computers at once through Bash scripting.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I find PS pretty great. Probably the best improvement to Windows since going 32-bit.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          For sure, it’s a vast improvement, but there’s still so much you can’t do with it.

          Mostly because unlike Bash and DOS, which are CLIs that get GUIs slapped on top, PowerShell is a CLI slapped on top of a GUI.