![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
Authentication is simply identifying a user.
Authorization is securing access to assets.
You can find a lot of reading about this if the distinction is confusing.
Authentication is simply identifying a user.
Authorization is securing access to assets.
You can find a lot of reading about this if the distinction is confusing.
That’s really up to the software again. If you’re not technically inclined enough to run through the code, that’s fine, but you have to trust that other people are.
Go and search GitHub issues or this project by name for what you’re concerned about.
Authentication is also not security, btw. It’s just access. If you can be more specific about your concerns in your post, you may get more direct answers.
Tunnels are not authentication.
Are you asking how to have each service challenge for authentication? That’s up to the software.
Firefox CODE has DNS overrides. How would being in a container change this?
Yes to the acronyms.
I’ve not heard of any “gas venting” for these small batteries, but maybe I’m not up to speed on that.
As far as active cooling fans, that would only be while on battery, not a constant thing. In the case of just preventing line faults from flipping the current on and off, only a battery will prevent that and stop damage to a PSU.
Eh. If people aren’t aware of it, now they are.
Firefox has its own DNS settings. Doesn’t pay attention to the host settings.
So I’ll just speak very generally, and assume you mean power conditioner, because generally a PCU does the VRU stuff, but not always the reverse.
So let’s say you plug a VRU into a faulty socket: the regulator will only power up the passthrough port when it has the input source stabilized to meet whatever it’s conditions are, and then it provides power - cool. What happens when that faulty wiring starts flipping on and off super fast, or has a drain for more than 5 seconds that doesn’t meet the line input conditions? Dead output.
Now let’s say we plug in a UPS which has all of the above features, but the wiring goes to fault - UPS beeps and provides power from the battery. No loss in power, and the server isn’t going down and rebooting many times throughout the day.
Anecdotally (meaning I’ve seen this hundreds of times live, but never seen a study), a UPS can take a LOT more punishment from power SURGES like lightning strikes, which I would be concerned about if the wiring is also faulty. There may be no proper grounding or surge protection in the building he’s describing if the power is this bad.
UPS does this already. It’s safer with a battery for a number of reasons if faulty wiring is a concern.
Are you sure the Firefox settings aren’t overriding your DNS?
Static site hosted by someone else for free is the way to go. I wouldn’t invite that sort of pain upon my network.
It’s a systemd-style way to manage podman containers that aims to be as easy to manage as compose/swarm. Not quite an integration, but operates similarly, and about as easy to read. Less heavy than managing a local micro-k8s cluster. That’s about it.
How would it know what to send? Why are you bothering if Unbound if you know how all the networking works?
You’re describing split tunneling. If you’re unfamiliar, just look it up. It’s how most VPNs in workplaces are deployed when you only want specific access to specific things. Just need to change the route rules in your Wireguard config, and set the correct forwarding.
This is a very confusing setup, and I’m not sure what the intent or end goal is here, but it sounds like you just want split-tunneling for a specific subnet that puts traffic where you want it to go.
The problem with this is that you need something specific to differentiate traffic because source won’t be enough: DNS, IP subnet, origin port…etc. VLANs won’t work with Wireguard, and I’m not sure you want to go down the rabbit hole of trying to tag other traffic if youre not sure what it is.
deleted by creator
Do you have too much time to rant here but not read the articles you asked for? Lol 🤡
Well because one is WAY WORSE than the other, and the response of commitment is way different. You’re just plain wrong.
Wow. You do you, budday.
You seem REALLY on the Microtik brand for some reason. I presented one that didn’t have those issues, you retorted with some stuff, I responded with valid issues. What’s your problem?
It’s just a front-end abstraction for different c ontainer backends, so no. I don’t think they have some distinct features that deal in any functionality for the container ecosystem or anything.