• Maxx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      8 days ago

      The Inter typeface is very versatile and has many different options and variants, including more distinguishable uppercase i and lowercase L. The article just installed the base version as an example. https://rsms.me/inter/

      • moontorchy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Oh thanks! This is very helpful. Next thing to figure out is how to set those options as default. Found this gem after a bit of googling.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Do what? Nothing has even been done yet, they’re just discussing the possibility of changing the font…

          • priapus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Fair, they’re pretty common but most fonts support OpenType variations which let you change parts of the fonts to other variants. Having a variant with distinct l’s and I’s is pretty common and Inter supports this.

      • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        IIRC this issue is mentioned in the gitlab discussions (from months ago … not sure how this became news suddenly); they’re looking to patch Inter if they decide to use it as the UI font.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Like most modern fonts, it supports a lot of OpenType features, so this can be changed dynamically. Changing some settings by default has already been mentioned in the discussion around the change.

    • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I’m normally not someone who gets hung up on fonts but this one thing bugs me SO MUCH.

  • velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Isn’t Noto Sans just better, with lots of typography support for other languages? What’s the issue then?

    • thayer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I believe Noto is a much more robust typeface, with several more language options than Cantarell. Still, I do prefer Inter to both of those.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    If the Gnome team don’t like this new Inter font, will they return to “Déjà Vu”?

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    honestly I don’t see why they put effort into making a new font. there are plenty of freely available ones that are good enough

  • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Cantarell has served us well, but we’ve been wondering if it would be more beneficial to default to a more modern and well-maintained typeface

    Eh. I don’t feel Cantarell “dated” or “not modern”. I don’t even use GNOME anymore but I reckon Cantarell is actually a great font, it’s legible and has character. It’s almost like you can tell it’s about GNOME when you see Cantarell somewhere. If I were them I’d invest into giving it more weights (I’d really like it if it had a lighter version), variations and extending it. They have the power and resources to do so.

    imho they’re trying to solve a problem that doesn’t even exist. Inter’s default is a poor choice, as some of you have already noted here.