I think they want to know how many kilodollars it would come to

you can’t always get what you want, but sometimes you get what you need

wtf who says this to people? Who raised you?

I genuinely think AI is useful for about 2% more adoption of things than was going on before. 2% more coders, 2% more artists (for whatever that’s worth which isn’t a lot), just 2%.

“Researchers”

there’s also tons of reasons changing a form can lead to higher completion rates. 200% isn’t uncommon, most forms are hot garbage, and not because of their underlying software architecture

Great argument bud.

you’re making good points, so please don’t see what I’m saying as needlessly confrontational. What I’m saying is that this happens to any game that uses it in any way whatsoever, so it can’t just be about quality, it moves into ideology.

You’re conflating things that aren’t related. if they do shit work, criticize the shit work. This is obviously rallying a witch hunt based on the tool used. You could as easily say in 1996 that Toy Story is shit and if they cared they would have bothered to hand draw all their work. it’s just a different way of making visual content, as is all the virtual content you see in any game, the textures, polygons, fake lighting, etc. all generated by a computer at the direction of a human.

eta: I’m not gonna argue with all of lemmy about this, just want to add: I wish these devs would actually just be honest, also. They keep going “I don’t know how this happened!” but obviously it happened because it was useful to the process of making games. just own up to it.

downvote if you want but I honestly am struggling to care at this point. We need to make every studio that uses a technology that’s been around for years do this stupid dance every week?

If you flipped a mirror back and forth fast enough to “split a photon” you’d end up generating a bunch of photons due to the heat energy generated by the system anyway. I’m sure that’s not what they’re talking about but just imagine something oscillating that quickly.

They could couldn’t have called it the Unalloyed Gold edition? :/

maybe you now have 1 lack of items?

the first time I heard “1997”, in a movie, in the 90s, I freaked out, like no way that’s a real year.

What do you mean dbz_episode_001.exe is a virus?? I got it directly from limewire dumbass.

the l-long run? do you mean like f-fo-three quarters?

Two weeks from now: The Sri-lankan cab drivers behind YouTube botnet wracking up millions of views on Alberta separatist groups

is this a Jesus pic?

Yeah not even trying to be difficult about it but multiple people use computers*, like multiple people might watch a TV. Which is why it was decided forever ago that responsibility lies the parents who own the device rather than collectively all of society like is being requested here.

(* I’ve seen it pointed out lots of times that a lot of Linux instances are also not ever really used by any particular person, like in an IOT device like a motion sensor, or a fridge or just a bunch of virtual instances as well; really this whole thing doesn’t make any fucking sense on a lot of levels)

The DOB field is different from name and address because it is a fixed attribute that never changes

(Preface: I’m not really disagreeing with your larger point) This is not really correct though. I have a computer and I’m in my 50s. So it’s in 50 year old mode. Now my grandson who is 7 is in front of my computer. What utility is the fixed age that was gathered years ago in protecting the actual child user in that case?