violet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-211 hours agoIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1736 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1736imageIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayviolet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-211 hours agomessage-square43fedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareFreeBeard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up59·11 hours agoThe lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·10 hours agoHow would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·10 hours agoJust build a robot that understands consent, easy
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 hours agoUnfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoWell if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoCopilot certainly isn’t getting it.
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 hours ago“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
minus-squareMoffKalast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-25 hours ago“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 hours agoOne-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
minus-squarenymnympseudonym@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoJFC watch your language there are kids on here
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoThat’s the other way around human -> robot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-245 minutes ago“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for. (Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)
The lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.
How would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
Copilot certainly isn’t getting it.
“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Homosexuality then!
Wait.
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
(Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)