Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along…

Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/

Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was ambivalent about systemd up until now. If this gets merged I’m moving to a non-systemd distro. I do not live in California or even the USA. I do not want age verification garbage in my OS.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      Iv not given a shit one way or another as well. But as a Californian I refuse to have this shit on my PC damn be what the law says.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s being added as a response to the age verification laws with the intended purpose to provide the age signal.

        It’s age verification/attestation.

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          No. It’s a date of birth. You’re right that age verification comes next, but this is not it. Had this field been present before, none of this would matter.

          Contact your representative, not your local FOSS maintainer.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            Contact your representative, not your local FOSS maintainer.

            They’re not a US citizen.

            They also didn’t say they would contact the maintainers. They said they’d just change distro to a non-systemd one.

            And you’re nothing but silly trying to act like this isn’t about age “verification”. We know it is, because it comes in response to the new california law

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Contact your representative

            Right, so that they can ask if I’m stoned or stupid for asking them to affect laws in another country?

            • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Then this doesn’t impact you in any form. (Especially since it’s just a DoB).
              You can continue to whine but frankly I don’t see the point then.

              • lucas@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Of course it does. This particular change may seem innocuous in itself, but the idea of compliance with ridiculous laws like this one, in one jurisdiction, being implemented in a project used globally will result in compromising everyone’s privacy/security, regardless of whether they are even subject to that law or not.

                If anything, it’s more troubling for those outside the relevant jurisdiction, since we get 0 say on the laws, and have no actual reason to comply.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Consider PCLinuxOS: they’re an RPM-based mandriva (mandrake/conectiva) derivative with really great and wide compatibility in stacks without the ‘modules’ shitfest RH started after no one remembered what ‘alternatives’ was for.

      They don’t use systemd, but their installation is a bit shite as it’s a “live CD” installer – they pruned out the proper templatey install that mandriva has. But so far that’s the biggest issue. If they can get off networkManager we’ll be even better off, though.