• desra@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Consent scales, the one thing we all owe each other is basic human decency and a right to live our lives unimpeded as long as you’re not harming anyone. Filming/eavesdropping/invading boundaries and making people uncomfortable in a space let alone their own skin is grossly invasive

        • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It absolutely is! But you know what it’s not? Violence. As soon as you start being hyperbolic you lose nearly all credibility because now I think “right this person is being dramatic”

          • desra@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            How can someone be dramatic about consent?

            I’m not saying jump to violence immediately. We can start with rehabilition like Nordic countries, something as extreme as exile or yes violence.

            I try not to assume anyone’s country of origin/habitat but with America we’re seeing first hand when the only accountability is a slap on the wrist, a finger wag and shame on you fine.

            • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Because by using hyperboly you’ve stretched the truth of that narrative you’re trying to convince people of. my head, that immediately makes you seem untrustworthy, and I’m likely to start writing off your concerns as dramatics. It’s all about credibility, at least with me and I assume with others as well, claiming violence for being filmed is like claiming assault because someone leered at you, it’s over the top and I will this treat it as ridiculous

    • lumen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Filming in public is not a form of violence in and of itself. Have you ever noticed that the public is called “public”, which is the opposite of “private”?

      • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        sharing that information with facebook is the violence. i don’t care if you take a photo and print it out to have it in a photo album. i care when i am in a big tech database, or even worse, an intelligence agency database. not that the two are very separate.

        • lumen@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s a twisted view on the definition of violence… Anyhow, how would you distinguish between people filming for journalistic purposes, people filming and sending it to Meta, and people filming for other reasons? How would you decide who deserves your violence?

          • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 days ago

            if i feel uncomfortable being filmed i will make myself heard, first nonviolently, then maybe with a bit of physical pressure. if I don’t even get to know when i am being filmed that’s intensely devious.

            • lumen@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              You can’t force people to act on you’re subjective feeling of being uncomfortable. Can’t.

                  • Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    Yes…………

                    Notice the ‘should’ in there?

                    That word implys that he is talking about a moral prerogative and not a judicial matter…

                    Which of course means its unenforceable. You’re missing the point entirely if you think that even needs to be brought up.

                    Him: “People Ought to // ought not to do this behaviour”

                    Your: “Cant Force them hahahaha pwned 😎"

                    Maybe just take a second to think about the implications of what you’re reading instead of embarrassing yourself like this going autocomplete mode and writing irrelevant ass comments

                  • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Seems pretty enforcable to me. Hell, they were even able to compel the U.S. Olympic committee to pay out hundreds of millions when their lead team doctor sexually harassed so many athletes that he’ll be in prison for the rest of his life.