• Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    the fact they’re responding to criticize so quickly makes me think their desperate to keep AI going, their scheme is cracking.

  • unfinished | 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I used to think DLSS was a cool technology that allowed older GPUs to run demanding games at high resolutions, I myself had good experiences with it, but this? DLSS 5 is literally an AI slop filter for video games - not an upscaler anymore, just an enshittification filter. So disappointing. I’d rather play at 720p than use this shit

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yeah well yr mom says ur wrong abt her ability to choke down fat hawg 24/7

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The dildo seat maker says you’re “Completely wrong” about their new ass-blaster 4500 being the new standard for seats on buses.

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Too late, the anti-AI fanatics hate it, and won’t listen to anything except people who agree with them.

    If you don’t like the demo, or don’t like eventual game screenshots, just don’t buy the games that use it (or don’t enable it). It’s a tool and it’s up to developers to use it in a way that makes the game look good - or to fail at doing so.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If this was a opensource dev making some filter for games it would neat. Like Big Naturals Withers. But this is like if Gamesworkshop said if ypu want to play a game based our IP you have parade out big naturals withers at least once an hour of gameplay.

      Nvidia litterally does that kind of shit all the time, and they are in an even more insanly dominate position then ever.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      just don’t buy the games that use it

      This is called the “Free Market Fallacy”, and is always a terrible defence of any shitty practice, whether it be games or vehicles or banks or HOAs. The market just isn’t liquid or efficient enough for that to be a reasonable position.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The market for video games is pretty efficient. It doesn’t apply to necessities, or services with natural monopolies, but Nvidia has competition not just from AMD but also its own old tech, and games arent necessities.

        But really this isn’t about the market: you have a choice of whether to buy and play games you find ugly or not.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          are you a bot? I ask because that response was grammatically completely coherent and intelligent-sounding, but the entire content bore no relation to reality. I mean there’s not even anything to argue with, it was just straight up 100% wrong.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            But they’re not wrong. Video games are a luxury and you can just decide to not buy games that have features you don’t want.

            The only way to make the companies change is to vote with your wallet. Just look at the Kimmel fiasco. It only took Disney losing like 1% of their subscriptions to change course.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Would a bot tell you to stick your smarmy non-reply up your arse?

            If you disagree, you can just write what you disagree with.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You miss the point. Nvidia will pressure future titles to need DLSS5, which means you will need a $3000 GPU. Huang is literally celebrating shortages of chips.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Oh no, whatever will we do?

        Looks at massive library of unplayed indie games

        I somehow don’t think nVIDIA is going to be able to pressure all the indie studies into requiring it, do you? Even big studios generally want to be able to run on hardware 2+ generations old, so it won’t be a requirement for ages, if it ever is. Therefore: save your hate for actual games that actually look shit.

    • Dearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The demo made Indiana Jones into Iowa Jack. Why would anyone think it’s cool to completely remove the soul of your favorite games?

      The market for ultra- realistic graphics in video games is shrinking every year. People want smooth graphics and clean mechanics

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I say “shut the fuck up & go bankrupt already” is this a headline too?

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I have been looking forward to this tech for almost a decade now. Just don’t use it if you don’t want to use it.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Why is this particular revision the one you’ve been waiting for, as compared to any of the previous DLSS implementations?

      • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The style transfer filter specifically, not DLSS in general. If you look up NVIDIA Canvas you can get a better idea of what was anticipated and why there is so much potential in this. I expected it show up in the NVIDIA overlay and Ansel stack but it does make sense it is part of DLSS.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well, that makes sense then, lol. That’s pretty much the entire selling point to this version besides performance improvements. Personally, like a lot of people online, I’m not a fan of what I’ve seen so far.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yea I mean the pictures they shared were ugly but I don’t care about some settings I am just happy that a goal I have been waiting for has been reached. Which is real time style transfer on games.