• bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Very true. People have all kinds of stuff they don’t actually need, but just like having.

    I’m not sure the number of guns someone owns makes a difference regarding public safety and gun crime.

    I support stricter gun laws in the US, registered ownership, some kind of license, sales only through licenses dealers, restricted advertising, waiting times, safe storage requirements, etc. A lot of gun regulations in the US are not very effective and more symbolic. Bothering legal owners more doesn’t necessarily help with violent crimes using firearms.

    Fundamentally the main reasons for gun crime are social and can improved without changing gun regulations.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I agree. The main reasons for crime are social and in America that should definitely be improved upon, but have you questioned why specifically gun related crimes are so high compared to let’s say knife-related crimes? Because in Europe it’s probably the opposite, knife-related crimes are higher than gun-related crimes.

      • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes, easy gun availability makes gun crime more likely. If you think your victim might have a gun, you want to use a gun to rob them. Knives are very deadly weapons as well and very hard to regulate.

        In many European countries it’s easier to get a gun illegally than legally.

    • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Any kind of registration of ANYTHING in the US is a bad idea. Especially at a time where the federal government is openly genocidal towards certain minorities, especially trans people. Having a list of trans people who own guns would be free eats for them if they declared every single one a terrorist or enemy of the state.

      • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        A valid concern.

        A gun registry wouldn’t list if people are trans or not though. A list of trans people you would get through healthcare and insurance. Changes of a legal name is probably registered somewhere as well. So they would need to cross reference.

        If they want to go after trans people individually, they would go for leaders and activists first. They are easily found on social media nowadays. Then go after organized groups.

        An individual armed trans person is much less of a concern, than organized groups armed or not.

        • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          If there were to be a registry it would have to be in a way that it does not associate a person’s face with their ownership, it should be a token that only points that the gun is legal to own.

          I personally think that if I was one to put gun control up, I’d start with making handguns harder to own in some manner, or less attractive to steal or use, and starting a mandatory training program for anyone trying to own a firearm ran by both government officials and volunteers, with various training regimen and hard exams to weed out potentially violent individuals. Oh, and also I’d completely disarm the police everywhere like in Europe. Regular cops don’t need guns to radar cars in the highway, go to someone’s house to take notes on a burglary that they’ll lose later, or respond to an autistic kid having a meltdown.