• chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Nah, I’m mostly saying it isn’t black and white. It will have some effect on all layers, but I agree it wouldn’t stop all violence. To take your note about school shootings; yes, many of them are from legally purchased firearms, often a parent or something. Not all of course, so a gun ban would probably reduce, but not eliminate, school shootings. Plus outright bans aren’t the only form of gun control the US hasn’t tried, there are multiple things that can be done to limit without outright ban guns.

    • Azrael@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s true, and I can’t argue with you there. Banning guns would solve some problems, but you’d also be opening pandora’s box.

      Given the US’ history with guns, banning them would almost certainly fuel a violent black market, making it easier than it already is for criminals to illegally obtain unregistered firearms. And with an estimated 400 million guns already in existence in the US, it would be really difficult to enforce, even if you did manage to pass a law. And loopholes exist like gun shows and private sales.

      Regulating but not banning outright would be a slightly better solution, but it wouldn’t be a silver bullet (pun not intended).