• sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Imagine flying to other continents and discovering they divide land by natural geographic formations. Americans could never.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You mean aside from a lot of our states, and the Texas-Mexico border, and portions of the US-Canada border?

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Thank Thomas Jefferson for that brain damage. It has a lot to do with why most of our topsoil is now in the Gulf of Mexico.

    • Shnog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We use lots of natural borders as the delimiters of given states. The Mississippi River is a big one. You see it more out east than west IMHO.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey those are fully intentionally drawn to ensure everyone has just enough ethnic and religious minorities to ensure they force those groups to be a problem for them. Also to screw the Kurds

      • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        True, but I was referring to copses of trees, creeks, hillsides, slabs of boulder, underground water. Things that are a pain in the ass to farm around so often affect the division of property lines and then the selling rates of land.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That happens in parts of the US that actually have those things, just not in the super flat bits that don’t have anything interesting in them to use as a boundary to begin with. Kinda hard to break things up by rivers or ridges or trees when there aren’t any there naturally. But near me, that stuff is super common as boundaries for fields for exactly the same reason.

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Fun fact: the trees used to mark those boundaries are called witness trees, and since they were never chopped down they are the only remaining old growth trees in a lot of areas.

          • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Does the area you live in not get deforested? We generally pull boulders and whatnot out of the ground when we have to in order to make more sellable plots

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Not really, no, though there are logging operations and they sometimes ruin large swaths of land by planting shit like a whole forest of pine where there used to be a healthy mixed forest.

              This area is pretty heavily wooded yet, though. The fields that are here are old, generations back stuff with more natural boundaries, rows of wind-break trees between fields and the like, swampy areas left in field corners. We aren’t really adding new farmland here either, in fact there are incentive programs to reforest former farmland. Often old farmland is used for development.

              We do pull stuff out if we are developing the property, sure, but otherwise no, most land is left pretty natural.

              • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I guess I shouldn’t speak for places I haven’t lived, even here in the US. that sounds way less shitty than what I’m used to

          • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            There’s plenty of that in the prairie. it’s a pain in the ass. unless you’re living on land so old that generations before you did all the work getting it ready, which would also be when things were divided up

    • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Those were divided over natural formations due to practical concerns (war and defensible positions), not out of some love of nature

      • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        probably, but the fact that it works out better for nature is still notable. also market forces behind checkerboard country are just reprehensible and will never have consideration for human life, let alone nature

    • gay_geek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My husband is American, and his whole family gathers for Easter every year. We return to Thailand next week.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Its an American war, the kind where Americans only notice or care by their prices going up.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Things are always calm and normal in the US while we’re at war with another country.

          I think that’s why we’re always at war, and why the effects on oil prices get all the attention. That’s the biggest conceivable effect of the war on most americans in their minds.

          It’s like Europe is the city where all the people have to live with one another, and the US is the mansion out in the boonies with almost no neighbors, and the inhabitants are dicks to the few neighbors they do have.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Uhhh I mean the country itself is fine(ish) the war isn’t on our land it’s in Iran.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio are the interesting parts of the Midwest (and Minnesota and Wisconsin). Once you leave the Great Lakes Midwest for the Great Plains Midwest you’re gonna be bored out of your mind until you hit the Rockies. Iowa is so boring its tourist traps are trucker themed.

        I did the drive from Ohio to the PNW a year ago and yeah, it’s bad when you’re missing Ohio and can’t wait for Wyoming… Minnesota rocked though, absolutely awesome rest stops, we were glad to take a detour there to shave some time off South Dakota.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Fly carefully! The nukes come from there! Seen it in movies! Farmer diligently bailing his hay and suddenly a nuke flies out of the ground behind him, the poor bastard!