• ftbd@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Awww, did someone get addicted to unsustainable energy sources that are artificially cheap due to externalized costs?

    Edit: For context, the highest price shown in this picture is still 32% cheaper than gas was in Germany BEFORE your genius president decided to start a war, and around 42% cheaper than it is now. And seeing as we’re still burning fossils like there’s no tomorrow, it is apparently not nearly expensive enough yet.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No, it’s not. We all know that we cannot afford to put any more CO2 into the atmosphere. So reasonably, any new CO2 that is emitted would have to be (permanently) removed via carbon capture. That would be the true cost of emitting CO2, but instead, these effects are externalized to global society as a whole, making gas at the pump artificially cheap by cheating everyone else.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Well, y’all had the chance to elect people less influenced by the oil lobby. and y’all collectively failed.

        • Dale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          At no point in my lifetime have we had a chance to elect anyone not influenced by capital lobbyists. Our elections are a farce where the choices are between letting things get worse or keeping them the same. We’re ratcheting further and further into hell every few years and given nothing but the illusion of choice to prevent it. The votes and opinions of the working class have literally no statistical influence on legislation passed in this country. None.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yep, 1/3 of us choose not to show up, because the candidate wasn’t perfect or they couldn’t be bothered, along with the disenfranchisement of people due to “voting reform”.

          I wish it mattered that a lot of us voted against this shit, but just as many wanted it/didn’t care, so here we are. It fucking sucks here 😕

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I’m not just talking about Kamala here - Bernie being listed while running on a pretty popular programme, just because the right would audibly consider it “communist” (while they’d still do so even if the Democrats brought out a plan that matched the GOP 99.999%) is another good example.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Same answer applies. We consistently have a third of the population sit out of the general, and only a fraction of voters participate in primaries.

              Too many are apathetic and don’t participate, or become so entrenched in purity politics and reject anything that could stem the bleeding because it’s too middle of the road and stay home. A lot of our problems could be solved by an active and informed electorate, but too many want perfection and are willing to sacrifice passable to get less than nothing.

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            19 hours ago

            No, because my country has continuously overthrown (or at least tried to overthrow) authoritarian regimes that served other interests rather than the people’s, for the past 300 years alone.