Read the whole thread

However, we don’t have a “hardened security” approach, we aren’t developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice.

  • Fedpie@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think it’s fair they support way more phones than GrapheneOS, even if the security is way worse. But it’s a whole other thing to call people who want secure phones pedophiles.

  • rbits@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Another quote from the thread

    Their marketing heavily focuses on avoiding Google and gives the impression they believe privacy means avoiding one company. Meanwhile, they add a bunch of Google services not present in the Android Open Source Project and give extensive privileged access to Google apps/services.

    From @grapheneos.org

    • rbits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Recently, France’s national law enforcement began fearmongering about GrapheneOS and smearing it with inaccurate claims. France’s corporate and state media heavily participated. Many articles and also radio/television coverage misrepresented GrapheneOS as being for criminals.

      From @grapheneos.org

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Lmao what a toxic piece of shit

    Privacy is something everyone deserves, not something only criminals want

  • FEIN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Kind of shameful of /e/ to blatantly disregard user privacy like that. Is Graphene our last stand against Orwellian surveillance?

    • lennee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      i honestly dont care much about privacy in the sense that i dont rlly need it to be provided by an OS, just give me max freedom and let me handle privacy myself. That being said I am on grapheneOS atm but still hoping for librephone to enable me to have an arch linux like phone experience that i can customize to hell

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I can’t believes he’s intentionally anti-privacy. Occam’s razor suggests he’s instead a fucking idiot.

    • rbits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah maybe. But whether it’s intentional or not, I would not want to use /e/os.

      But also, from the linked thread:

      Murena is a for-profit company owned by shareholders including Gaël Duval. /e/ has a non-profit organization which is also led by Gaël Duval. /e/ includes paid services from Murena. /e/ very clearly exists to build products for Murena to sell in order to enrich the shareholders.

      Despite being done for profit, /e/ receives millions of euros in funding from the EU on an ongoing basis. /e/ and Murena use extraordinarily inaccurate marketing to not only promote their products/services but also to mislead people about GrapheneOS and scare them away from it.

      From @grapheneos.org

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    First they came for people I don’t like, I assume, and I said hell yeah, there’s no way that will ever be me. Over here, officer. Come for a few more kinds of people I don’t like. Nothing bad ever happened to the French!

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    To be fair I don’t know anyone that has ever used e/OS or considered it to be a serious project

    • RenardDesMers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly, the fact that it is supported by default on the fairphone was quite appealing to me but this poor opinion from the CEO rubs me the wrong way