It’s not fun interacting with them when they often want to engage in ad hominems. This is why I have no interest in the tankie triad.

  • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auEnglish
    0·
    11 months ago
    • I strongly object to silencing trans voices on trans issues, even if there are other trans people who feel differently or even if they are okay with the silence. People are tribal, cis or trans, and of course there is a self-selection effect, where people on blahaj are in favor of the blahaj administration for the same reason people on lemmy.ml or Hexbear are in favor of their instances’ administration
    • The 196 mods were clearly wrong. I took Ada’s side, to the extent I cared about that whole thing, just because I’m in general opposed to the "boss"es of whatever environment telling the users what to do. It sounds like Ada was doing the bulk of the moderation, anyway, and the mods were just there to give orders but shirking the actual work involved.
    • I definitely wasn’t in favor of shitting on JordanLund in that way. I don’t even like Jordan, but the consistent effort to paint him as a Zionist (along with me, FlyingSquid, PugJesus, and more or less anyone who is opposed to a certain noisy contingent of users) and the wild gross personal attacks are not at all something I am in favor of. I think you can probably find me standing up for him against some similar abuse if you look further back, maybe not, but in that individual message I mostly just kind of didn’t want to get involved in it and wanted to clarify my Israel stance and peace out. Look and see if you can find me calling someone a “twat” in anger, or talking about their grubby sticky fingers, anything like that, instead of just it being in a message I’m responding to. You might be able to, but as much as I can manage, I try to get heated about issues and events and not about people’s personal characteristics.
    • I didn’t respond to your message just because it was long and it was going to take some doing to look up all the links and unpack it all, and I’d already done what I thought about things more or less to death. If you really want me to, I can go back and take a look, I’m not trying to ignore it but it was a long argument with a lot of repetition anyway so hopefully it’s understandable. What the hell, I’ll take a look later today I think.
    • I wasn’t implying people who care about politics on whatever side are losers. I was saying that people are accusing PugJesus of being a loser because he cares and argues about politics, and lemmy.ml is the glassiest of glass houses as far as that accusation.
    • I had no real problem with dbzer0 up until a couple of days ago, I actually generally liked their instance because it seemed sensible. Some of the mods’ politics I don’t agree with but that is par for the course and normal. Now having observed some of their decisions at close range I don’t feel that way. I did think about “migrating” to some other place for the topics I care about that have communities like YPTB on dbzer0, but just like in the 196 case, it doesn’t really work entirely that way, and anyway if they continue to let me say what I want to say in YPTB, I probably won’t really care beyond just voicing my opinion on it all.
    • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      0·
      11 months ago

      I wasn’t implying people who care about politics on whatever side are losers. I was saying that people are accusing PugJesus of being a loser because he cares and argues about politics, and lemmy.ml is the glassiest of glass houses as far as that accusation.

      Ok, that makes more sense.

      I did think about “migrating” to some other place for the topics I care about that have communities like YPTB on dbzer0, but just like in the 196 case, it doesn’t really work entirely that way, and anyway if they continue to let me say what I want to say in YPTB, I probably won’t really care beyond just voicing my opinion on it all.

      It’s up to you. I think it would be good to have another !yptb community that’s not satire or a one person creation.

      You could potentially enforce more respectful discussions there.

      • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auEnglish
        0·
        11 months ago

        You could potentially enforce more respectful discussions there.

        I actually lean more towards the side of “let the people talk.” Some direct personal insults I feel like are maybe worth keeping away (I read this comment and was going to voice my agreement but then when I got to the “moron” part that instantly made me conclude, welp buddy, that’s not productive). Mostly though I think the main asset of an alternative mod feedback community is that the dbzer0 admins are fine doing deletions and bans from YPTB for various reasons including “trying to stir up instance drama over our genAI policies, which are not up for debate.” UP-FOR-DEBATING THE POLICIES IS LITERALLY THE PURPOSE OF THE COMMUNITY. But, as soon as someone comes into it and disagrees with the dbzer0 admins on some issue, they often decide it is some particular category of not allowed debate, and ban the person.

        There are some other examples on that page that to me are equally stupid, but that one takes the cake to me. If I were to make a competing YPTB community, I think that’s the most important rule I would change, personal attacks being allowed or not is a lot less crucial than that to me.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          0·
          11 months ago

          This is a direct consequence of having that community part of dbzer0.

          A community is still subject to the rules of the instance hosting it.

          A potential alternative would be to have the alternative community on an instance with a very few rules, but there’s none that I know of at the moment.

          Israel, drag, AI, every topic would still come up in the comments of a new community, and the mods of that new community would probably have to take a stance on those, or just see endless slapfights in the comments

          • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auEnglish
            0·
            11 months ago

            An instance whose rules include “the rules are not up for debate” has no business hosting a community for critique of moderation. I would actually expand that to say that it’s pretty silly to have that rule in the first place, regardless of what communities you’re hosting, but it does seem to be a pretty popular viewpoint here for some reason. I’m legitimately surprised to hear it from an instance that’s described as anarchist. The .ml instances are at least more open with their political alignments and then consistent with them in their moderation in practice.

            Scratch an anarchist and an authoritarian bleeds, I guess, lol