Serious question. We had a perfectly serviceable word, yet everyone decided to shift. Is it just that it’s shorter to type?

If so, I feel for your colleagues trying to parse your code when all your variables use abbreviations.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The CS department at the University of Washington with all sorts of tech companies starting up? I mean, sure, if you want to believe your timeline, you’re free to feel that way, but claiming this was standard by 1992 is ludicrous to me.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          People at the University of Washington don’t refer to soda pop the same way as people at Berkley, or at MIT, or at Oxford. Why would they all have had the exact same term for writing software?

          Edit: I’m being argumentative, I honestly have no idea what term was common then. At that point most people I knew referred to it as “computer stuff”

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Since you’ve admitted to being argumentative, I’ll point out that you misspelled Berkeley. I was accepted there into EECS, though neither MIT nor Oxford. As it turns out, if you don’t apply, they don’t notice you.