• FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The karma system has its own problems and I’m glad Lemmy doesn’t have it, but it also means we need to solve this another way.

    Let me guess: by banning people you disagree with?

    • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is just dumb and I suspect you know.

      by banning people you disagree with?

      By banning people from posting if the majority doesn’t want to see what they are posting. If I was in the minority of downvoters I would simply block you.

      But if I were to invite people to Lemmy now, it would go like: “it’s amazing but there are a few people posting bad stuff every day and you have to manually block them to make the place enjoyable”

      It’s not just me, it’s objectively the majority. And that’s excluding people who blocked you and thus don’t downvote you.

      You act like you have some undeniable right to post whatever you want if it doesn’t break the rules directly, but you seem to forgot that the rules are there to make the community enjoyable.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        By banning people from posting if the majority doesn’t want to see

        I suggest you try Lemmy.ml, you will feel right at home over there.

        BTW I didn’t realise your name is “Majority” 😂

        • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Brother, look at your vote ratio. Do you want screenshots? Or definition of the word majority?

          The post you are literally commenting under:

          29 upvotes, 64 downvotes