• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 天前

    Unsurprisingly, centralizing your data between the private and public sector means everything is vulnerable at a centralized location.

    The exposed materials include files labeled ‘secret’ in Chinese

    In Chinese?!

    whoa.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 天前

    how do you exfiltrate that much data without anyone noticing?

    and dude wanted some puny change for it, like a million bucks or something lol.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 小时前

      It’s a supercomputer center, so I imagine large data transfer is normal in the environment. They could have piggybacked on existing high-throughput data workflows, or somehow blended into expected large transfers. Data can be exfiltrated over weeks or months, across multiple endpoints or accounts, … and compression could have happened prior to transfer (meaning the transfer may have been smaller than 10PB). Monitoring could have been inadequate or bypassed.

      I imagine the puny change could be indicative of wanting a fast sale. Possibly, if they decided to store the data on cloud drives via a credit line. They might want a sale before the bill comes.

      Edit: yup

      According to the alleged attacker, they gained access through a compromised VPN domain, then deployed a botnet to extract data. Instead of transferring data in bulk, the attacker distributed the exfiltration across multiple systems and moved ‘smaller’ amounts over about six months to avoid detection. Such a method relies more on exploiting system architecture than on advanced hacking techniques, which in part helped the perpetrator to avoid detection.

  • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 天前

    Curious to see if another LeakBase will pop up around this. I’m already hearing rumors that a lot of it was AI training data but that’s unfounded squiddy speak on social media.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 天前

    you’d need a data center just to hold that much information! it’s not like your using cloud storage for this, this is an expensive payload

    • bright@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      A petabyte is 1000 terabytes. There are commercial hard drives that are over 30 tb. So 33 of these drives hold 1 pb. Times ten makes 330 hard drives to hold 10 pb. All of those drives together would take up just one third of a single full height server rack like this.

      https://www.quantumtechnologyequipment.net/products/s6llst3137

      So not only wouldn’t it need a whole data center, in fact it wouldn’t even need a whole server room, and actually wouldn’t even need a whole server closet!

      I calculated this all out only because I’m procrastinating😆

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 天前

      With modern high capacity drives, it’s possible to have that storage in a single rack. If would probably be about $500,000 worth of drives though.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 天前

        $242k AUD if using the bare minimum number of HP 14TB enterprise drives (cheapest I can currently find)

        Throw in some redundancy and call it $250k AUD or $179k USD