A few days ago I made a post to gauge this community’s opinion on whether it should allow nice comics by bigoted artists. I think we have a consensus.

The majority of comments were very in support of banning comics by artists like Stonetoss and Jago. I heard from queer people who said they’d feel safer if the rules were changed. A lot of people were concerned about this community becoming a “Nazi bar”, the comment expressing that feeling got a LOT of upvotes.

The people against the change had two main arguments: anti-censorship, and personal responsibility. A few people equated active moderation practices with book burning. Nearly all of these “against” comments were downvoted or ratiod, and tended to have a lot of arguments underneath them, while the “pro” comments went uncontested.

On the internet, 10% of people will disagree with just about anything. With that in mind, I think we’ve reached a consensus. The community wants a rule change so that users can’t post inoffensive comics by bigoted artists.

That means no more Jago comics. I see a lot of people in the comments under the Jago posts, getting angry and saying they want this rule change. People aren’t happy with the user who’s posting all the Jago comics.

Mods, this is what we want. Please change the rules and get Jago’s comics outta here.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I agree, and It’s all because of the distorted form of freedom of speech they have in USA, we generally don’t have that problem in European democracies.
    For instance FOX News is simply illegal by European standards, because they lie and distort reality.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Maybe similar flavor, but they can’t possibly be as bad, because much of what FOX does would be illegal.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In Europe it is still there, far right extremists love to complain about cancel culture, about being censored, etc.

      But yeah, they generally prefer to sue for defamation when someone criticises them

    • Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      In online spaces there also seems to be this wierd thinking of “if it isn’t illegal you have to accept it”.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes, which is really stupid, some people seem to think that freedom of expression means that sites have to allow their stupidity. Which is far from the case.