If you’ve never seen Jim Carrey’s 2007 psychological thriller The Number 23, then congratulations. It is a film about a man who sees the number 23 so many times that he ends up going bonkers. I used to think this film was stupid. However, now I appear to be living it.

My own personal number 23 is a rhetorical device: “It’s not X, it’s Y.” Everywhere I look, there it is. Whenever I hate myself enough to scroll through Facebook’s wilderness of algorithmically suggested posts, I find myself being smacked in the face with sentences such as: “Self-improvement isn’t a trend, it’s a lifestyle shift,” and “The small wins aren’t just moments, they’re the majority of your life.” Once you notice it, it becomes impossible to ignore. This weekend during a Peloton class (I know, shut up), I heard an instructor bark a variation of “this isn’t X, it’s Y”. Yesterday, a character did the same during a TV show I was reviewing, and I dropped a star from its score in retaliation.

You know where this is coming from, don’t you? “It’s not X, it’s Y” is an AI mainstay. It’s one of ChatGPT’s most insidious tells. No matter how innocuous a prompt you enter, AI will always find a way to sneak it into its response. Ask it if you should put more ham in your pasta, and it will tell you: “Ham doesn’t just taste good – it makes everything else taste better.” Ask it if you should chase a bee around your garden and it will say: “Bees aren’t stupid – they’re hyper-specialised”.

It’s beyond irritating to me that because LLMs were trained on writing that uses such constructions, being competent at writing now makes me get accusations of using one to create a post or comment.

This isn’t really the case on Beehaw, but head over to Reddit, post a cogent, well-reasoned comment, and the knives are out.

I think the most infuriating part is that instead of engaging with the content (I’m there mostly for debate, anyway), they attack the structure and lob accusations. That’s not a conversation.

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Layouter? This is the first time I’m hearing the term, and I’ve designed tens of thousands of newspaper pages.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Probably a regional phrase. I’m in Scandinavia, English terms get absorbed and reappropriated into the language(s). Never considered that wasn’t the original usage.

      But yeah, I designed, laid out, and did prepress on a few periodical art magazines here. I was the whole graphics department 😉

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I, over the years, learned how to do everything through prepress. I don’t know how to get the plates on the press, but pretty much everything up to that, I can do.

        • haverholm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I never got near the actual printshop (usually done abroad to cut costs), but yeah. You pick up stuff all along the production chain.

          Especially when the printer offers to do some small change in the print files for “a modest added fee”… No thanks, tell me what you need and I’ll fix it myself!

          “All em dashes in this 200 page book have somehow been replaced with hyphens? 😨 Give me ten minutes!” 😂