Can you call it winning an argument when it’s just two sentences?
Dragonite is being stupid, but whatever current says isn’t invalidating anything Dragonite says. No proof that the game is AI slop, and even if it is, no point is made to link it as invalidating the game.
I’d prefer if the title was “Further SLAMS Dragonite about their stupid opinion on Pokemon Winds & Waves!!!1!”. At least the hyperbole is obvious.
Can you call it winning an argument when it’s just two sentences?
Dragonite is being stupid, but whatever current says isn’t invalidating anything Dragonite says. No proof that the game is AI slop, and even if it is, no point is made to link it as invalidating the game.
I’d prefer if the title was “Further SLAMS Dragonite about their stupid opinion on Pokemon Winds & Waves!!!1!”. At least the hyperbole is obvious.
The “game” literally is AI-slop, though. You can tell just by looking at it. And if it’s AI-slop, it isn’t a game.