• BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Cachy uses a lot of unstable patches. I wouldn’t recommend it just for benefit of bunch more frames.

    • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So far it has been the most stable distro I’ve run, since moving to Linux full time three years ago, i think they are doing something right, idn 🤷

      • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Agreed. The only major challenges I’ve had with CachyOS are from my Windows VM or from not realizing that Docker containers are the best option for server-type things, like the controller for my WiFi mesh network. Once I stopped trying (and failing) to run that from the AUR, it’s been smooth sailing.

        But most people would just buy the dedicated mesh network controller, and the only reason I need a Windows VM is for SharePoint integration in Explorer, which is a fairly specialized requirement. Even as a power user, I almost exclusively use the web apps for O365 just so I don’t need to use Windows.

        Apparently, earlier in CachyOS’s history, there were more issues, but I don’t think that’s at all true anymore. I tried installing a more “standard”/conservative choice, Debian on my wife’s and friend’s laptops, and it’s been way harder. I should have just stuck with “unstable” CachyOS, and it would have been much more stable. Turns out things usually get better with newer patches. Who knew?