• Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ok cool I guess because some people are fucked in the head we have to censor the entire world, never have art, all cultural differences have to be banned, and we just can’t enjoy life.

      The actual FUCK does it matter that some people are fucked in the head. Deal with that problem as is it has nothing to do with cultural differences of nudity.

      Nudity is not sex. If you are physically unable to process that difference then that needs to be something you address about yourself.

    • Lupie@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Some people sexualize feet, hair, and even stuff like mailboxes. Everything is sexualized by someone. If we only made media that no one found sexual, media simply couldn’t exist.

      Also, being nude is the natural state of a person and shouldn’t be sexual.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Is defending pedophilia REALLY the stance you want to take?

        If some rich asshole buys an island and brings all his rich asshole friends to the island, and they spend their time sexualizing mailboxes? I mean…not my thing, but I’m not angry. I’m not judging them. I’d be a bit confused, but I also wouldn’t seek answers.

        And feet? Well, that can go two ways. If the feet are either fake, or attatched to a consenting adult? That’s fine. Again, not MY thing, but nobody is being hurt here. If the feet were either severed, or attatched to a non-consenting adult? Then we have a problem.

        But there is no outcome I can fathom where child nudity in media is ok. Sure, not EVERYONE would sexualize it, but some WOULD sexualize it. THATS the problem.

        I see no avenues where someone sexualizing a mailbox leads to rape, or worse, child rape. Because at NO POINT can a child ever consent. All child sex is child rape. So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”

        And this then turns into a case of “this is why we can’t have nice things”. The 10% ruin it for the 90%. Then you remember the thing being discussed is child nudity, realize it’s not a loss at all taking that away. It’s not a nice thing you’re losing.

        So from that perspective I REALLY have to question why you’re so insistant on enabling pedophiles.

        • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          So if you know 10% of your audience IS sexualizing your media, and 90% isn’t, you have to ask yourself “Is it worth it to leave this in?”

          10% of the world is sexualizing you, what happens to you now? The world needs to act—i guess it has to remove… you? Yes… remove you is the solution to pedophilia! Removing you ends pedophilia! Interesting.

          Point is, just because rule34 exists of someone doesn’t mean the problem is rule34. What if I add in something that I made for my mom to enjoy and that gives a hard on to some weirdos. Must I now change my art for my mom to enjoy because weirdos get a hard on? These are the questions people ask and they reason differently than you do. You can’t accept that for some reason.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Nudity is not sex. Why the fuck do you care so much as child sex anyways that you seem to have a fixation talking about it.

          All it looks like from where I stand is your the only pedophile here.

        • Lupie@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You really have lost your mind. Maybe don’t listen to any Nirvana albums or you might implode.

        • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I prefer realism.

          The Hulk is really gonna keep his pants (shorts even) after his shirt and everything else he’s ripped?

          Like if something is gonna rip your clothes, it’s kinda gotta.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Well, as they can’t molest a cartoon, that’s their problem. We don’t need to make it anyone elses.