Socioeconomically disadvantaged young dudes are angry.
Instead of broadly shaming them for that, relate to that anger, temper it, show them how to use it in a controlled manner, and point it toward something useful, constructive.
Give them a rules-based, defined, productive outlet for it.
If you just tell them to bottle it up… they will eventually explode, and cause collateral damage.
How sad is it that a goofily angry man on the TV is a better parent than anon’s parents?
Well, it doesn’t matter how sad it is, because most parents these days are working too many jobs for not enough money, to even possibly be decent parents.
Thats just reality.
… You wanna beat the fascists at their game of weaponizing male insecurity and angst?
Provide a better version of channeling that insecurity and angst: Give them a framework for thinking and acting that they can channel the anger and energy into genuienly useful and productive forms.
Actually show them a positive, socially beneficial form of masculinity, that gives them their own identity, instead of a cultic group identity.
The people telling boys to bottle up their emotions are the fascists. I don’t mean that everyone who has said this is ideologically fascist, but that’s a practice that, like you said, it only causes problems in society. The fascist impulse, the Hitler particle exists inside a lot of regular people and is reinforced by our social institutions especially the exploiting workplace.
There is a larger cultural issue at play here, but culture is dependent on the economic factors, and vice-versa
No, the fascists scapegoat minorities and direct that rage towards them. Rage can be sated vicariously and ICE, the police, and the military provide that when they are vicious to out groups. It functions like bottling it up in the long run though because that violence doesn’t resolve any of the actual sources of that rage. Relief doesn’t require an outlet for the rage but a resolution for its source.
An important part of it is that they don’t simply redirect the anger. They actively and intentionally create problems that lead to more anger, then redirect it.
How do you get everyone pissed off at illegal immigrants? You first create a system that makes legal immigration impossible for most while also propping up an economy that rewards the use of underpaid migrant laborers with no rights. Now that you’ve created a problem that involves migrants, you blame the migrants for all problems to drum up support for your movement.
And the beauty of it is, people don’t have to be on your side. Once the debate over immigration gets fired enough, you’ve won. All the fighting over immigration is misdirection from your actual goals.
I will keep saying this:
Socioeconomically disadvantaged young dudes are angry.
Instead of broadly shaming them for that, relate to that anger, temper it, show them how to use it in a controlled manner, and point it toward something useful, constructive.
Give them a rules-based, defined, productive outlet for it.
If you just tell them to bottle it up… they will eventually explode, and cause collateral damage.
How sad is it that a goofily angry man on the TV is a better parent than anon’s parents?
Well, it doesn’t matter how sad it is, because most parents these days are working too many jobs for not enough money, to even possibly be decent parents.
Thats just reality.
… You wanna beat the fascists at their game of weaponizing male insecurity and angst?
Provide a better version of channeling that insecurity and angst: Give them a framework for thinking and acting that they can channel the anger and energy into genuienly useful and productive forms.
Actually show them a positive, socially beneficial form of masculinity, that gives them their own identity, instead of a cultic group identity.
The people telling boys to bottle up their emotions are the fascists. I don’t mean that everyone who has said this is ideologically fascist, but that’s a practice that, like you said, it only causes problems in society. The fascist impulse, the Hitler particle exists inside a lot of regular people and is reinforced by our social institutions especially the exploiting workplace.
There is a larger cultural issue at play here, but culture is dependent on the economic factors, and vice-versa
No, the fascists scapegoat minorities and direct that rage towards them. Rage can be sated vicariously and ICE, the police, and the military provide that when they are vicious to out groups. It functions like bottling it up in the long run though because that violence doesn’t resolve any of the actual sources of that rage. Relief doesn’t require an outlet for the rage but a resolution for its source.
An important part of it is that they don’t simply redirect the anger. They actively and intentionally create problems that lead to more anger, then redirect it.
How do you get everyone pissed off at illegal immigrants? You first create a system that makes legal immigration impossible for most while also propping up an economy that rewards the use of underpaid migrant laborers with no rights. Now that you’ve created a problem that involves migrants, you blame the migrants for all problems to drum up support for your movement.
And the beauty of it is, people don’t have to be on your side. Once the debate over immigration gets fired enough, you’ve won. All the fighting over immigration is misdirection from your actual goals.