• sheetzoos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sex work is work. There’s nothing wrong with PizzaCake having an OnlyFans.

    The problem is that PizzaCake buys Reddit upvotes and will ban anyone on Reddit who points that out. She makes low-effort engagement bait, which wouldn’t have become popular if she didn’t treat it like a pay-to-win game.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    No complaints about the comic here, but if I/we may go off on a tangent about the subject matter:

    To what extent is “destroy the patriarchy” a red herring to get people angry at “men” rather than “sociopathic billionaires of all genders?”

    Sexism is still a thing, of course, just like racism and all kinds of other awful shit. But those awful parts of our nature are often stoked by those in control to keep the attention off of them. “No war but class war,” as the Lemmings say.

    In my little corner of the world, when I see memes about crushing/destroying the patriarchy, it’s usually in the social context of a sticker on suburban moms’ Stanley cups, or t-shirts, or even occasionally SUVs. They (mostly) hate Trump, sure, but they have no problem with J. K. Rowling or Kamala Harris.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      To what extent is “destroy the patriarchy” a red herring to get people angry at “men” rather than “sociopathic billionaires of all genders?”

      Very little. The patriarchy is not about “men better than women,” but about enforcing rigid social roles that restrict everybody. Men are expected to show strength, be emotionless, and give their lives in the pursuit of social status far more than women. They are then brainwashed by the power they hold over women into thinking this is a good thing, all the while making us all less free.

      This dynamic is so powerful and so prevalent that it is the single greatest social strategy the oligarchs have access to. Every fascist movement on earth succeeds or fails depending on how well they exploit men’s place in the patriarchy. The problem with patriarchy lies not in who wears the crown, but how it turns average men into loyal foot soldiers.

      On the other hand, women like JK Rowling reinforce their own oppression, as do the actually toxic women who spend all their time hating men. They ostracize other women for not meeting their standards while viewing relationships with men as purely transactional and oppositional. Transphobia is common as they seek to make rigid distinctions between themselves and men. In doing this they cement their roles in society, which only serves both patriarchy and oligarchy.

      So no, destroying the patriarchy is not a distraction from class war, but an essential part in winning it. It has nothing to do with hating men, and the myth that it does is propaganda that only serves hierarchy.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It is not a red hearing at all unless it is used to displace another message. So if you were talking about class warfare and your message was drowned out or disrupted by a message of destroy the patriarchy then you could say it is a red hearing.

      Sexism isn’t just a thing, it is “the” thing to be honest. For example, the leader of the KKK commented over a decade ago that he would rather vote for a black man (Obama) than a white woman (Hillary). Let that sink in, one of the most racist people is still more sexist than racist.

      You bring up the fact that people in control use sexism to manipulate people. For sure they do just like they use racism. The crazy part is they might not even be racist or sexist themselves but they know it resonates with people so they will use it for their propaganda.

      I think you make a great point about a disconnect that those who are against the patriarchy may have with class issues. On the other hand you could also tie the patriarchy to issue like transgender rights through rigid enforcement of gender roles and fueling genocide with hierarchical structures.

    • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It is just as it is the major problem in a lot of countries and their societies.

      However, being a gal doesn’t make one perfect either. Thatcher and Elizabeth destroyed womens rights, workers rights, and protected pedophiles in their ruling tenure.

    • 𝓜𝓲𝓪@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Because that’s largely class reductionism.

      Fighting class is one of the most important battles, but it is not the only one in the war on hierarchy.

  • It’s hilariously sad to me that some people feel the need to let everyone know they dislike this particular comic.

    News flash: NOBODY CARES IF YOU DON’T LIKE THIS, PLENTY OF OTHERS DO!

    So keep whining about how much you think a particular artist sucks, nobody is listening.

    • TheMuffinMan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t have any stance on this comic or this artist (never seen them before), but comment sections are kind of exactly for opinions to be shared.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        23 hours ago

        There’s discussion, then there’s just repeatedly showing up to things you don’t like just to tell people how much you don’t like them. Technically still “just an opinion” but honestly no one wants to hear it after the second time.

        What’s the goal there? Win Best Hater award? Have everyone pander to you and stop posting? Bah, away with that nonsense.

        • TheMuffinMan@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I agree, although this particular bit

          Have everyone pander to you and stop posting?

          works both ways - so much so that I initially misinterpreted your comment when I quickly scanned it before properly re-reading

        • TheMuffinMan@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Opinions (even negative ones) are a form of discussion.

          I get the sense that you are speaking out about circumstances relating to this specific artist (maybe they’ve been excessively hounded by a brigade of haters), but your original comment, esp. the last line was quite general, and is largely what I was responding to.

          • tomenzgg@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            your original comment[…]was quite general

            some people feel the need to let everyone know they dislike this particular comic

              • tomenzgg@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I mean, do you feel that it radically changes the sentence?

                While it specifies that especially the last line was general (which I agree), the sentence is still saying that Courtney’s entire comment was quite general while the very first sentence of her comment specifies it’s about this particular comic.

                The entire comment cannot be general when it contextualized its subject right from the first sentence.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s ironic that even negative comments count as engagement and will most likely be a net positive for the creator.

  • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just don’t like the artstyle or the humor. I don’t think I’ve ever encountered a cat comic from this author, so I can’t say those are any better or worse.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        there’s a purity culture of hating PizzaCake it seems like. rather than just not liking PizzaCake, some people have to prove they hate PizzaCake. what’s the goal of proving you hate PizzaCake? to feel included and socially accepted. the funny thing is i’ve only ever seen this culture of proving you hate something arise around women, girls, and things women and girls like. i’m about to age myself a little bit but here’s a list of things that have gotten these purity hate cultures around them since i’ve been able to notice:

        • Britney Spears
        • Boy bands
        • Jessica Simpson
        • Twilight
        • Katy Perry’s come up
        • Lady Gaga
        • Carly Rae Jepson
        • indie folk
        • Hillary Clinton
        • women’s marches
        • PizzaCake
        • OnlyFans models
        • AOC

        and for all those people, and things, the purity culture around hating them just keeps them in the zeitgeist, an effect that has only been intensified by engagement driven algorithms. when you make it a point to say you hate something, you are platforming that thing and the things you say you don’t like about it.

        personally, i like Pizza Cake on the whole. i think she has some insights. i don’t find anything amazing or detestible about the art style. it’s just… a newspaper cartoonist’s style. it’s unique enough to be evidently hers while being clean enough to appear alongside other comics with a similar blend of insight, comedy, and personal testimony. it also helps her have a consistent style across the run of her comic. i see a lot of people complaining that the art hasn’t shown signs of practice or improvement, but that’s… exactly the aim of this style of cartooning. to be extremely consistent and repeatable in order to meet deadlines and to allow resharing long after the original was shared in the event it becomes relevant again.

        i guess my point is… if you, the reader, hate PizzaCake, that’s fine. i won’t convince you to not. but you won’t convince me to hate it either. so just move along. proving you hate something only makes that thing more visible to others. do what i do when i hate stuff: don’t talk about it or think about it. if you come across it you can say “oh, here’s another thing that’s doing something similar i just like a little more better”

        not everything has to be vitriol all the time

        • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Only seen this culture of hate around women

          Yeah, that’s toxic masculinity incel culture for you.

          WOMEN BAD, WAIT WHY NO ONE SEX ME, WAAAAAAA

          • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            23 hours ago

            for sure. i wasn’t gonna touch on that since there was already so much to say but for most of us on this platform, misogyny is the hegemony that’s so built up that it’s become invisible to us

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Carly Rae Jepsen is awesome. I dislike all her other music, but Call Me Maybe is great. Violins in pop was an awesome trend and one day the world will come to its senses and do it again for a few short years.

        • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Okay, but basically all of those up until “women’s marches” are objectively shit. PizzaCake is fine, got more laughs from me than Grafo, back in my reddit era.

          • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            things can only be objectively shit if they’re actively harmful. of what i listed i can really only say with my whole chest that Twilight, Katy Perry post come up (hence why i specified her come up), and Hillary Clinton are actively harmful in some way. AOC also gets an asterisk because my perspective is that all politicians are to not be trusted, but AOC is one of like 3 politicians i can think of who are putting in work to reduce the amount of harm politicians do.

            i’m going to particularly push you on indie folk. what’s so objectionable about rural people expressing their emotions, providing alternative programming to the actively harmful radio country? this seems less like it’s “objectively shit” and more “a piece of pop culture ephemera in which you were not directly centered”

            • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              24 hours ago

              My eyes skimmed over indie folk, I actually love that. But the rest are straight trash. Also, I’ve been awake for too many hours and probably nothing I post right now should be considered a reasonable take lol

            • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              AOC is one of like 3 politicians i can think of who are putting in work to reduce the amount of harm politicians do.

              I’m guessing AOC, Bernie, Zohran?

              Well remember to add Greta Thunberg to the list, she’s a great politician. Politics isn’t just electoralism, there are direct action politicians.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            pizzacake is one of those comics where i realized that i’m just outside of its target demo and that would have felt like an uncomfortable realization if i hadn’t already bought my midlife crisis bicycle. it’s good for what it is, but i just don’t resonate with it. her art has definitely improved since she started and she seems to enjoy it so that’s cool.

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t, personally. I never mentioned it on this platform until this comic specifically addressed the topic.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          When you phrase your opinion as “I don’t like this so you shouldn’t get to enjoy it or see it” that’s a problem. In fact I think that’s THE problem that’s being called out here. Do you go into a restaurant and specifically call the cook out of the kitchen so you can announce to everyone that you think the food is bad? Because that’s what it seems like.

          They are talking about “I don’t like this artist, but to each their own” comments. They aren’t even talking about valid criticism of the author (I see some actual valid criticism here that I’m fine with).

          I am not even a pizza cake fan. I have no skin in this race. If I never saw another one of her comics again it would not matter to me at all.

          • k0e3@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I don’t follow this artist so maybe people complaining about “undue hate” toward her is right. There’s a lot of toxicity out there toward women and misogyny needs to be stomped out.

            Having said that, I made my comment because the OP of this thread didn’t even tell anyone to stop enjoying her comics or invalidate her points. It wasn’t hateful or anything. The response to OP itself felt oppressive as if to say anything negative one has to say about strong women falls under misogyny or that it’s invalid.

            I dunno, maybe I’m overthinking it. I just felt uncomfortable with the comment I responded to because I really don’t like her art style either and I don’t wanna see it on my feed. It made me feel I’m being accused of misogyny for having—or god forbid, sharing—such an opinion.

            • atrielienz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Solutions have been floated in the comics community that would allow us to “tag” content by placing the author of the comic in the title so that people could filter out content they don’t want by using the filters Lemmy does have.

              I understand why it wasn’t adopted but it would solve this problem as well as the problem of indexing and prevent reposts of the same content.

              Either way, people are allowed to like things. They’re allowed to dislike things. But messing it up for everyone over the trivial and subjective idea that someone doesn’t like something that doesn’t hurt anyone is I think what a lot of the comments are calling out.

              There are actualities where artists are doing real harm and those have valid criticism (looking at you JKR). But the dislike this artist often seems to get can be equated to the hate that Nickel Back get. Like. I’m not presenting them as the best band to ever have lived. Not by a longshot. But they aren’t like… Terrible? And music taste is subjective so what are people dunking on them hardcore for?

              That is to say it seems like hating pizza cake is trending and that’s why so many people have to tell you ~they’re vegan~ they hate her art.

              Sorry to the vegans for the joke. Y’all are alright. I just don’t share your distaste for meat and milk.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Probably because her comics are so misandristic. Would you find it strange if people said they didn’t like misogynstic comics? I’m guessing not.

    • 𝓜𝓲𝓪@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s fair, people have their preferences.

      It’s only an issue when it’s toxic misogynistic nonsense or “snark” hate. Which PizzaCake attracts a lot of from the reddit crowd.

      • She did fuck up with a bad take in one comic - not that the bad take was such a fuckup, but her behavior in the wake of it was ridiculous. However, that was one incident, and we have a larger trend of her publications to draw conclusions from. In light of that, I see someone who is generally on the right side of humanitarian issues, who had a bad take and got overly defensive about it. I do NOT see someone who accidentally went mask-off and revealed a true evil behind their online persona. Which, I think, is the take the reddit crowd you mentioned would have us believe.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The art style IMO is very standard newspaper comic strip. I appreciate them not trying to force something unique and distracting, like that artist that has floating off-face dots for eyes, or the one that has darkened spear-points for noses.

      Humor…well, I guess it’s the eye of the beholder. Not everyone agrees on what’s funny, and direct social commentary isn’t always meant to be funny.

        • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think most do. I don’t even downvote. This callout probably isn’t aimed at lemmy communities, but I still wanted to share my thoughts.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        i am going to disagree with you about your unique and distracting examples, i love those ones. okay maybe i’m a bad example i fucking love (web)comics. like all of them.

    • It is what it is. I’m aware that my personal experiences/situation/identity are topics she deals with regularly in ways that mostly agree with mine, and that that may color my attitude toward her. Neither of us can be held responsible for liking or not liking Pizzacake comics. Glad you were chill about discussing it though, pretty cool of you.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Counterpoint, you can have a multi dimensional opinion instead of blind love or hate.

    Some of her stuff is funny but imo there is a lot of cringe too

    • Gaja0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Man this topic always pisses me off because she paints her haters as biggots, then bans people with valid criticism.

      She didn’t make an oopsie. She made an offensive SA joke and the mods white knighted the comments. She doubled down too, not even apology. Just called anyone who disagrees a misogynist.

      Like I don’t feel like I have to say women deserve rights to point out what’s wrong with her threatening critics with DMCA takedown.

      It’s why lemmy is actually great. I might still get 10 down votes but I won’t get banned completely by a mod simping for an OF creator.

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I believe that PizzaCake is Penny Arcade for women, and Penny Arcade is PizzaCake for men.

    This opinion may piss some people off, and I don’t care. The comics are of equal quality, but PizzaCake has more opinions I agree with because I, too, am a gender minority.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Oh, now this is a take. The essentialism is a bit lazy, but the vibes fit, right down to the dickwolves debacle.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Man you’re gonna shit when you find out women have been reading PA the entire time

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        heh. i got introduced to PA by the woman who everyone was bothering me to marry my entire 20s (one of the few people to be able to learn the musical technique that bears my name, btw, which makes her one of the top performers of that instrument in the world. AND SHE RETIRED. we’ve been besties since, uh, a year or two after i graduated high school? i met her in the same band i met my wife in, her older sister and i were/are close. have done a lot of music together.) and she’s not just a brilliant musician, she plays video and board games too. And is not single, sorry dudes. she’s a hell of a catch, she just isn’t my kind of fish.

    • RudeOnTuesdays@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know why people would be pissed off, as this comment isn’t clear if being compared to Penny Arcade is supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I would be delighted at the comparison. I don’t care if they are saying “they have the art style of early dinosaur comics” i’m still getting a qwantz.com reference i made them think of dinosaur comics holy cow i got compared to ryan north hells yeah

        that’s just me, but you follow?

        • tomenzgg@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think Penny Arcade’s one of the few comics where I think their character designs got worse, the longer they ran.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It’s truly bad, I’m lucky they released such an intensely mid comic on the very day I chose to liken it to PizzaCake (Which is also often mid, but has got a lot better since she went more controversial)

          • Odo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            The last couple comics are callbacks to characters who haven’t appeared in the comic for years, peeking in to see how they’ve changed and grown. It’s nostalgia for longtime readers and won’t make sense for anyone else.

        • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Wow, the art style has changed drastically since I last read those. It’s been years and years.

          They genuinely used to look a lot more like the comic in OP, artistically.

          Edit to add:

          This one is supposedly from the 90s, but much closer to what I remember regardless.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        eeee! what are you user tagging with i am having to use my brain and i ran out of memspace years ago. remembering Capital Grail (They are One of my favourites) is getting easier for me but ooo that would be nice to have a digital postit note. sorry, hook and loop note.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You’re comment is just part of the opposing super secret conservative psy op created to sow distrust and delusions among the left.

      Nothing makes the flat earthers stronger than thinking everything everywhere is a deep state psy op made to spy on you.