The penalty [for LLM-hallucinated info] is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue.

who@feddit.org · 7 hours ago

The penalty [for LLM-hallucinated info] is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue.

Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz · edit-2 2 hours ago

[Justin Angel] My guess is that this policy will be applied selectively depending on institutional privilege and personal notoriety. It’ll end up as a tool of silencing unconnected individuals vs. promoting better scientific discourse. // I aspire to be wrong.

Doesn’t it sound weird that someone immediately assumes (i.e. makes up) the policy will be implemented unfairly, as soon it is announced? Well, if you check their profile, it doesn’t:

Justin Angel // @JustinAngel // AI, iOS & Android dev. Worked at Meta, Uber, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft building apps, developer platforms, and hardware. Tweeting about LLM psychotherapy.

Plus almost all of their tweets are about LLMs. This stinks “competing interests” from a distance.