• DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    People should actually read digg.com homepage. The articles dont give the full story. So they’re just starting out focusing on Ai, but plan to expand what digg aggregates. Guess we’ll I just have to see how that goes…

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Let me get this straight. They pulled it offline because it was overrun with bots, and legitimate users had no influence.

    Their solution was to hand all influence over to a bot.

    Genius. /s

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Digg watches what 1,000 of the most thoughtful voices in AI are paying attention to, and ranks the stories they’re pointing at by what’s rising fastest,” Rose said.

    It also uses AI from services such as xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Gemini to “classify public accounts, summarize public posts and linked articles, describe public media, generate topic labels, score public content and power search.” That would explain how Digg quantifies user sentiment into a percentage for its posts.

    Focus on AI. AI apologists from Xitter. Powered by AI summarizers.

    Barf.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wow thats like… the exact opposite of a thing I would want to experience.

    I guess good job on creating a business model as rage bait?