Can someone please explain what this means ?
it means i just dont believe brave browser is real, but someone else can probably tell you what i truly meant!
looks like an unattributed pmjv
It is indeed and is dedicated to the public domain
There is still a distinction between something being public domain so not needing to ask permission and giving attribution which is always a nice thing to do.
There are 3 browsers. Everything else is just a reskin.
then what’s konqueror?
And only 2 main lineages left, Chromium and WebKit are both KHTML descendants
There’s also QtWebEngine, WebKitGTK+ and all the tui browsers.
QtWebEngine
which is Chromium
WebKitGTK+
which is WebKit
and all the tui browsers
…yeah, and I’m sure someone out there still has a working telegraph, but I wouldn’t list it as part of telecommunications infrastructure.
hey, links2 is still alive and well, and there are now terminal browsers like chawan that can render images mostly correctly. There’s also a few that are actually either chromium or gecko. avoid those.
… and there are now terminal browsers like chawan that can render images mostly correctly.
Oh good, so they’re kind of on the level of Netscape Navigator.
around and about sorta. still no javascript tho
I do use links2 sometimes for looking things up on wikipedia or reading blogs or something like that, easier than starting a gui browser. but the usecase is a tad niche
QtWebEngine is just Chromium.
But yes, Links and Lynx are real.
You could argue Goanna is its own thing by now. It was forked from Gecko, but Blink/Chromium was initially forked from WebKit.
There’s also Servo and LibWeb, but I don’t think either is really usable yet.
What about LadyBirdEdit: that’s LibWeb
Unfortunately Brave does exist, but you still shouldn’t use it. They run a crypto thing, they built AI into their browser, and have done shady stuff in the past.
I hear Vivaldi is great, if you want a Chrome-like.
Vivaldi is proprietary.
