• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    As long as they are clearly marked as AI-generated, I can safely ignore it.

    Oh, yeah, and also: Barnes and Noble is still in business?

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s probably arleady a bunch on the shelves. This is good new for smaller indie bookstores.

  • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Then I back no longer walking into a Barnes & Nobles and giving them my time or business.

    I’ve got the archive for a better selection of books.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It was a greasy Thursday morning and the air smelled of Novocaine and Pepsi. Gary shifted in his seat to take the weight off of his ears.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So long as you steal the books - absolutely don’t give them a cent or we’re just supporting the industry.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Legit ethical question: since LLMs are trained on stolen knowledge and art, is stealing an AI book theft? Also, given the current US laws about how an AI “work” cannot be copyrighted, what’s to stop me from taking someone’s AI “book” and just slapping my name on the cover and reselling it?

        • Insekticus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Absolutely nothing stops you.

          Thanks to AI, where no true creativity has gone into the process of writing, it has no inherent value nor creator - for all intents and purposes, it may as well have suddenly apparated into existence. As soon as it gets created, it’s an “early bird gets the worm” type situation of staking a claim to ownership. Like a car that suddenly manifested into the world, created by no man, made of no man’s materials - it’s a free-for-all.

  • kandykarter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Honestly, I hope they do. It’d be funny to see the sales figures. I don’t care how much anyone likes AI, but nobody wants to read AI novels.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Will they label which books are AI? No law says they have to. Now never can shop there ever again because can’t trust the books.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can confirm. I use AI quite a bit, including writing stories where I have editorial control (that’s a dumb decision, she does the other thing!). The best AIs might be able to manage one short passable chapter, but it’s going to be shot quality without massive amounts of hand holding and rewriting.

      It can be entertaining in a choose your own adventure sense where each page really only needs to be barely coherent and minimally cohesive with the other pages. I sure as hell wouldn’t pay $25 for an AI-penned book.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Hey well at least typos serve as a marker that everything is human written. You know, for all the comments about how AI is fancy autocorrect, why the hell is autocorrect still such fucking garbage??? Just do the things with the damn thing already!

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It’s funny that LLMs generally have stellar spelling and grammar, but LLM/AI assisted autocorrect, at least the version on the iPhone, is horribly inferior to standard autocorrect.

            Now that I read what you said again, I think I just said the same thing with other words. But I’m so tired I’m just writing what I’m thinking and I should go to sleep, but I’m here writing what I’m thinking.

            Anyway, I agree with you!

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So this is how society crumbles. Not with a nuclear explosion. Not with war. But instead with brain crippling stupidity. This is the world we live in now. Book stores filled with romance novels about Romeo and Julie. Where the author writes a bit about biting the thumb, but it goes in a very literal, violent and bloody direction that’s supposed to be romantic.

    Never thought I’d live to see the day where smart people AVOID reading books!

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When I worked at B&N way back in the day the policy was to sell any book that was legal to sell, though many would have to be ordered. In that regard, as long as AI slop is legal to sell I don’t have any particular problem with a store selling it.

    I wouldn’t buy it, of course. It’s bound to be wretched.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Why would I pay money to purchase a genAI book when I could just have Copilot gen me one up at home!?