The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • RegularJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “This technology turns every router into a potential means for surveillance,” warns Julian Todt from KASTEL. “If you regularly pass by a café that operates a WiFi network, you could be identified there without noticing it and be recognized later – for example by public authorities or companies.”

    Later…

    Inexpensive or older routers either don’t store history at all or keep it for a short time.

    Newer models can store more information for more extended periods.

    https://www.thetechwire.com/how-long-does-a-router-store-history/

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We used to recommend people to run the newest stuff possible, but we came to a point that maybe it’s better for us to keep with older tech for a good while

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      From what I’ve just read, the tech doesn’t seem ready to identify people yet. It can supposedly detect hand gestures, but facial recognition I seriously doubt. But that’s probably just a matter of improving the tech. See this article for more info.

      • obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        that’s a trivial problem to solve. combine this with a camera for facial recognition in a public space. then you’ve got wifi signature combined with the photo/video for facial recognition. then presumably you can use the WiFi signature anywhere else, even without the camera and be able to identify people.