• commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    I’ve defaulted to ddg for like 2 years now. Solid. Good enough. Really what happened is that SEO optomization websites even before the AI craze made Google search so awful that ddg became just as good if not better for me than google

  • Yliaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    DDG isn’t the holy grail people make it out to be; it has contracts with Microsoft and we all know how Microslop likes AI.

    • Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      No, they’re not, but they are one of the better-known alternatives to Google, and they do advocate privacy. This, in itself, is a good thing and should be promoted.

      The problem is that Google’s monopoly on web search is so large that using Google is the de facto standard for the vast majority of people. Getting them to acknowledge that there are alternatives to Google benefits privacy on the internet more than DDG having contracts with MS harms it.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    For what it’s worth, DDG recognized this immediately.

    They dipped their toe in AI search, felt the pushback, and went all-in on putting toggles and immediately accessible opt-outs everywhere. They put a filter for AI images (and I hope they do the same for AI SEO spam).

    In other words, they actually leaned in and listened to their own users. Unlike the soulless vampire on a throne Google has become.

    • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      46 minutes ago

      While their first party browser convinced me if it’s privacy capabilities, I need extensions (yes, recognizing that makes me much more fingerprintable) so I use their browser less than 1% of the time.

      However, I have subscribed for their premium Services because I already trust their anti-tracker on my mobile devices and they have sufficient number of VPN nodes to be useful to me (I do miss Mullvad, and probably will use them when I’m traveling International, but it is getting harder to find good nodes and they don’t have servers in south Korea at all, either).

      And their measures to make a neutered and neutral AI interface is the first time I’ve ever paid for general AI access, finding it’s helped some of my efforts as AI has been a necessary component for building my home studio and mini rack. I’m scared that my brain has already been ruined, acclimating to Google’s integration of Bard and then later Gemini, and I make a regular exercise of hunting for sites that have articles or discussions that will help me work through tech projects and puzzles “the hard way” with just vanilla search queries and amendments.

      I love that DDG’s tech stack seems to play well in the general broader ecosystem, so it’s my search engine of choice for all of my Gecko/Fusion browsers (Fennec, WaterFox, LibreWolf, and occasionally, full-fat vanilla Firefox).

      I had really thought I could grow into using Kagi but I couldn’t make it make sense for myself. When you’re limiting paid subscribers at the first tier to 300 general web queries a month, and i could consume that many just on correcting my own typos and re-searches alone, DDG was a better investment for me for the time being.

      TL;DR - I love that these guys play well with others, so I’ll even pay for the access because I need them to still exist in a decade.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Until real Americans take their country back from the corrupt pedophile protecting “administration”, I’ll mostly avoid US search engines altogether.

    • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Those who enable and finance the pedophiles are international… they won’t disappear when Trump dies, they have old money and are multigenerational. Trump is just a stooge for international interests, like Epstein was.

      See Deutsch Bank, for example… they financed Trump with billions of dollars, and broke the law to do so. Without them, Trump would not be President today.

      Also, look at the funders of organizations like The Heritage Foundation; coincidentally, many members are shared between them and the Council on Foreign Relations. All of this will remain when Trump is gone.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I haven’t used Google for about three years now, other than to compare it to DDG results now and then.

    They are not the same, in spite of the claims of others on Lemmy.

    DDG does have an AI assistant that you can turn off (allegedly). This is on Firefox browser, Windows OS.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The thing about THAT is Bing built their house literally copying Google’s homework. In the early days (maybe 2013? Long before they went masks-off) google published examples of them inventing new unique words that didn’t organizational exist in open web pages, and those popping up and Bing search indexes 3 weeks later.

        Kagi, at least according to a few talks Doctorow of the EFF gave in recent history, admit their indices just came from Google’s as well.

        Watching everyone’s favorite advertising agency turn heal so swiftly has been one of the biggest bummers of my adult life.

  • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    yep, me too. you can put “-ai” at the end of your search to shut off the slop, but it’s a PITA. Often I’ll just go to DDG.

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Its not crazy hard to install your own searxng instance. Works pretty well. The problem is that the Internet itself is turning into AI slop.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The problem with your own searxng instance is that your searches across other engines come from your IP address.

      So if you’re searching for something, everyone knows it’s you using IP triangulation. Google then tracks you around the internet.

      If that doesnt bother you, OK great.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Dude I don’t even know what that is or what it does and I’m pretty sure most people don’t either. It might be easy but what the heck even is it?

      • vodka@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It let’s you have one search website where you have it pull results from all other search engines (that you want) and then it can rank results based on where things rank on the various engines.

        Tl;dr self hosted search proxy, with some advanced features

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have it installed in a docker container in Linux both as a search 3ngine for my local AI setup, and for regular browsing.

      Setup and installation is a great use case for AI.

      Go to Google gemini, and ask it to create a step by step guide to install a container with searxng, and how to allow searches from your browser(s). Make sure you tell gemini that you are a simple user, not a power user, so it shouldn’t assume anything. Also ask it to make sure it shows you how to make the container autostart with the pc. Tell gemini that you want this in a step by step tutorial.

      Should make it easy, as you can ask questions if you get stuck, or something doesn’t work.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Last time I tried I had issues but it was quite a while ago. Do you know a good guide or something you can post?

  • Karl@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I use duckduckgo for simple searches and google when it’s something more complicated. I don’t like google tho, too nosy and too much ads.

    • orlyowl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s a DDG privacy first browser on Android. This is probably what they are referring to.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I thought it meant changing your default search engine.

      I never considered that it was an app.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      We’ve come full-circle. I used to download .html pages so I could browse them while offline. Now websites install themselves so they can browse you while offline.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I “love” when the wrong technology is applied.

      On the the dawn of the smartphones Mozilla tried to enter the space with an FirefoxOS and the pitch was that every app was just a website just more tightly integrated with the phone. The problem is that all the web stack is wonderfully resource hog and at the time phones were super underpowered running websites were not optimized in a browser that were not as optimized as today. So it was a terrible choice for the time being.

      Other good one was Android early days. They choose Java as the default app environment and development. It kinda makes sense to use it if you want the same program to run on different platforms, the problem, again, it runs worst and with the underpowered devices of the time everything was a slog. And they doubled down on the mistake by using a garbage collector that doubled the memory usage of every app. The cherry on top, at least in hindsight is that arm was and still is the de facto Android plataform, greatly disminishing the advantage of using Java/JVM. And today Google enabled apps with native code optimized for specific plataforms, but everyone only care about ARM so of you try to run Android like in an Intel laptop a lot of apps are not compatible.

      End of rant.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hey dude, just wanted to say that I learned a little bit from you today. Thanks for sharing on here.

        I remember Apple famously disallowing any kind of “Write Once, Run Anywhere” platform tech at the dawn of iOS, ATVos and iPad OS, quite openly trying to fuck with Adobe’s and Sun’s shit.

        But using apps to avoid needing all of the traffic and rendering capabilities for modern websites was key in its early days and I remember even 10 years ago recommending to clients and customers that were stuck with awful internet connections or underpowered devices, to try using the apps instead of the websites for things.

        Nowadays, I only want to visit so many corpo resources strictly through a browser and fighting tooth and nail to avoid ever letting their apps on my phones. I would literally fire a bank for not having a functional Web page to do what I need done , especially since I probably can’t be on vanilla android for much longer the way things are going and too many secure apps require Google Play services for their circle of trust.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Too many people are brain hostages to the idea that apps do everything and you need an app for everything, even though most of the things are just websites. But all the apps are really doing is spying while they deliver their version of the website.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I bought a literal thermometer, not a thermostat just a thermometer, which I wanted to log temperatures, and it insisted on me downloading an app and then setting up a free account. Noped out of that s*** and left caustic reviews but it was impossible to use without a smart device, without internet access, and without the invasion of privacy.

        Just repeat that story a hundred times and you’re describing modern domestic life.

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I just searched earlier and DDG had a link telling me to try its AI (I think it was on my mobile on firefox). At least it didn’t force it, I guess.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    DDG is not too bad, but when I click the sources from the AI search results, they often don’t contain the info from the search summary, so why even have it if it’s mostly a hallucination?