Transcript

Title text: This is how you all fucking sound

[A smug tech bro wearing a sideways cap, watch, chain around his neck stands in front of a data center by a lake with dead fish. A smoke stack blows pollution into the air]

Tech bro: AI is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a suit with cigarette in hand stands in a restaurant while two disgruntled diners cough from the smoke]

Suit: Smoking indoors is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a top hat and suit stands in a factory with two sad and dirty children]

Hat: Child labor is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug plantation owner stands in front of a field with with two angry slaves]

Plantation owner: The Atlantic Slave trade is already here, there’s no going back.

Still Vreni on Bluesky

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    23·
    24 hours ago

    Yep, by design LLM cannot become ‘inteligent’, you can only make it more believable but it’s still copying humans not really thinking by itself. No amount of development or money invested will change that, it’s not a pokemon it won’t just evolve into something different one day.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.netEnglish
      1·
      10 hours ago

      I think LLMs are intelligent. They’re at least as intelligent as My pocket calculator, and My calculator is intelligent.

      I think you’re setting the bar too low. A tiny amount of intelligence is super easy to program.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.worldEnglish
      26·
      24 hours ago

      And it’s worth reiterating, the current crop of generative “AI” is incapable of producing anything new or novel. All it can do is reassemble existing strings, tokens, and patterns in slightly different ways. Innovation can never come from such a machine. That will have to come from a human.

      The current push is the notion that “hyperscaling,” i.e. throwing even more hardware and space and power and money at the same concept, will magically make it something it isn’t. Obviously that’s not going to work. It’ll allow grifters to make a ton of money over it, though!

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        6·
        21 hours ago

        Obviously that’s not going to work. It’ll allow grifters to make a ton of money over it, though!

        Well said.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6·
          17 hours ago

          From TFA:

          The AI did not prove that its approach is the best anyone can do, though. In fact, mathematician Will Sawin has already improved upon the AI’s grid.

          OpenAI privately contacted Litt, Sawin, Gowers and a number of other mathematicians to verify the LLM’s proof. Together (and without the company’s direct involvement), they wrote up their individual takeaways. (No external experts have seen the AI’s original output, however—just an edited version of its train of thought.)

          What stood out, they said, was the AI’s preternatural patience and focus.

          …

          “AIs have an edge: It’s not just that they can try all known methods,” says Jacob Tsimerman, a mathematician at the University of Toronto, who was not involved in the work but was part of the companion paper solicited by OpenAI. “They can play for longer and in more treacherous waters than mathematicians without getting overwhelmed.”

          …

          The mathematical tools the AI used here are not novel, although their application in this domain appears to be. “The model did not invent something fundamentally new that nobody saw coming,” says Sébastien Bubeck, a mathematician leading OpenAI’s mathematical explorations. “It just executed like an amazing mathematician.”

          So, it’s a monkeys-on-typewriters situation with the computer able to try and reject the hammering of who knows how many square pegs into round holes until it finally arrives at a workable conclusion, which a human has already bested. And we’re not allowed to see its homework.

          This is categorically failing to set the world on fire, except possibly in the literal sense.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            2·
            17 hours ago

            After 80 years of fruitless struggle by human mathematicians, a major geometry conjecture has at last been solved—via a straightforward query to a chatbot.

            There’s value having tedious work done by AI so it can provide inspiration to real people, which is exactly what happened in this case.

            So, it’s a monkeys-on-typewriters situation with the computer able to try and reject the hammering of who knows how many square pegs into round holes until it finally arrives at a workable conclusion, which a human has already bested.

            Gee, sounds like it’s enabling people! The horror.

            This is categorically failing to set the world on fire,

            Things can be useful in the right context without setting the world on fire.