Transcript

Panel 1: [Coworker in a red tie with dark hair leans into the cubicle of IT who is busy on a computer, a key card or ID hangs around his neck]

Coworker: I clicked an email link and it says I need training?

Panel 2: [IT stops working and looks irritated]

IT: Ah yes. The Training.

Panel 3: [IT sprays the coworker with a spray bottle]

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

IT: BAD! THAT WAS BAD!

Panel 4: [IT continues spraying the coworker, now crouching down hands raised defensively as the water is sprayed in his face. IT ha a look of glee on his face as another coworker walks by with a look of concern on her face, papers in hand.]

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

FSHSSSH

Coworker: HISSS!

Alt Text

The next training module unlocks after three hisses

.

Source

  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I work at a large well established company. I get so many legitimate emails from outside our domain that I am required to click on. Performance reviews, company surveys, corporate training…

    Then they wonder why people click fishing links. Bugs the crap out of me. I’m not going to remember the exact domain of the survey company we use, what are you crazy?

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I’m not going to remember the exact domain of the survey company we use, what are you crazy?

      I agree, and have decided to err on the side of caution, and also put the irritation over on higher-ups. If I get some link I’m required to click that I’m not actively expecting from an unrecognised address, just trash the email. A couple times, I’ve gotten follow-up from a superior asking me why I haven’t responded to <survey>, and I just tell them I haven’t seen it and that it probably got caught in my spam filter. They send me the link in question, and I respond.

      I quite quickly realised that most of those surveys they need “everyone” to respond to will just slide quietly by when I do this, so I don’t need to spend time on them. My reasoning is that if it’s actually important, I’ll get it through a reliable channel, and so far that’s worked.

      To be fair, I also dump anything that comes from some variant of “noreply” to junk. I figure that if I can’t reply, and I’m not actively expecting the email enough that I check my junk folder, it isn’t important.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Look at the URL before you click. Enforcing plain text mails makes it easier.
      Spam/phishing also usually neglect the plain-text part in copying company mails. Yeah, a lot of shitstain companies too, but spam still looks different in plain text.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We use mimecast, so all links in emails are replaced with links through mimecast for them to check.

      That means you can’t see the original link easily though… So makes it harder to check if they are iffy.