• AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Even in an anarchist society, the movement of goods/services to those in need would arguably be taxes.

    For example, say you are in a fully anarchist community. If your community needs help collecting/producing some resource and you refuse to help, you won’t be a member of the community for long. The community (the government organization in this case) mandates that its members cooperate with the community. The charge may not be monetary, but human labor is still capital, capital that you are expected to pay towards the community.

    The implementation of taxes is frequently corrupt/questionable, but the idea itself is not

    • Coolans Planet@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well, yes, community would be like a family where everybody has to help to maintain it. But unlike our current system, the individual would participate in the decisions, instead of voting the guy who takes the decision on his behalf (and very often against his own interest and will).