VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 7 days agoWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1549file-text
arrow-up1549imageWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePixel_Jock_17@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 days agoIt definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general. But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 days agoWhich men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days ago“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.
It definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general.
But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
Which men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.
“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.