• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is dumb. There’s no reason for the genie to iterate though it in a loop.

    Wish one is granted, which simply switches wish two. Wish two is granted (in reverse). Then wish one is ignored, restoring one wish.

    If you wish to have a hotdog and then eat it, you were still given a hotdog. The wish was still granted.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In the fourth panel the smart genie just says.

    “As you wish” and promptly teleports away with his lamp.

    Regardless of how you interpret it, 3 wishes are spend and nothing more needs to change or happen

  • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Genie cuts your head off for trifling with them because they are powerful demons and not computers.

  • sqw@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of my favorite examples of a similar kind of self-referential language loop is the following:

    This sentence has threee erors.

    (Hofstadter)

  • turdas@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t really a paradox.

    On panel 3, the genie ignores the first wish, which means the wish in panel 1 never happens. Guy gets 1 wish back, but because he wished for his 3rd wish to not be fulfilled, that wish will do nothing. Genie peaces out because his job here is done.

  • Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ha ha, I have screwed you over and myself in the process making me the victor 😎