A post just in case nobody knows about it. This isn’t a conspiracy post, it can be done, the video link is there by Cyb3rMaddy to explain it more thoroughly. It isn’t new tech, it has been around for more than 10 years. It is just crazy to think that somebody can somehow tap into it, maybe your ISP. Who knows how this is being used today. Since there are no cameras on routers, it is unregulated. Your ISP can theoretically use your home Wi-Fi router to track your movements. By analyzing how your body and walls disrupt and reflect wireless signals a technology known as Wi-Fi sensing, AI models can map exactly where you are, what you’re doing, and even your posture. This is wild to think about, I am guessing regular people don’t know this, but it can happen. Since this can be done, somebody can use it against you. It can even detect human breathing rhythm and heart rate. Sitting at home and unaware. Your cell phone can be used as an Wi-Fi access point. Another example is your smart fridge that has Wi-Fi, it does send back data to somewhere anyway. Like when you run out of food or something. I would never get one of those, personally. I totally understand those people that just want to move to a cabin in the woods somewhere.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 小时前

    Your ISP can theoretically use your home Wi-Fi router to track your movements.

    This requires ancillary hardware that isn’t present on wifi routers, and then it also requires wifi devices spread around the place to provide a signal source for human bodies to distort, and then it requires significant computational hardware that also isn’t present in common home wifi routers.

    Not to say that the general method can’t be used for basic presence detection - Philips Hue ZigBee devices can use the variations in the background signal strength of ZigBee devices they can see around them to infer that someone is in a room, so they can switch lights on/off automatically. But it requires multiple devices in a room for it to work reliably and they need calibration as well.

    • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 小时前

      It was shown using a cheap ESP-32 board. Hell, someone could hack your smart TV if they really wanted to. Now, the 802.11BF Wi-Fi sensing capability is being integrated within newer routers. Your ISP can likely detect your movements and presence because the IEEE 802.11bf standard enables Wi-Fi sensing. I always question what ways we are being spied on. There is a reason the US banned all new foreign made routers.

      • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 小时前

        Yeah, one time, I tried to always stay on my mobile network to avoid WiFi location tracking, but the battery cost and the actual cost of the larger data plan were just too big. :/

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 小时前

    Just because something is possible, doesn’t mean that its in widespread use. TEMPEST has been around for decades, but that doesn’t mean its actually practical to do so, especially when it comes to widespread implementation.

    There are more important things to worry about.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 小时前

    i think this is related to this new app calle ruview and i think this is greatly exxagerated. not only you need a router, you need ESP32 nodes, plus you need to be relatively close to the router or have multiple router the bigger the location you’re trying to scan. and i don’t see how you isp would be able to do this from far away…

    https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 小时前

    Oh man I’m glad I’m using an open source firewall with no WiFi and dedicated access points which have no access to the internet