• qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Because, like, it’s plain obvious your “run toward a firing machine gun” is a figure of speech.

    I’m curious what you think OP meant by their statement seeing as they claim my interpretation was reading something that wasn’t there. You’re saying it’s not literal and they’re saying it’s not the idea that war wastes lives carelessly. So how should someone read the statement that the military teaches people to run into machine gun fire? It reads as a critique, although I suppose that could be the start of the misunderstanding.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      39 minutes ago

      It’s about teaching people to disregard their own self-preservation, when following orders. That’s why they say “it scares me”.

      It doesn’t need to be machine gun firing (part for the whole; “dangers in general”); or literally running towards it (hyperbole; “risking to get harmed”).

      You might agree with their point, or disagree with it. However, “le ackshyually to le narwhal bacon’s knee, you’re instructed to take cover lol EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!!!” doesn’t address what they said at all. And, like, people get rubbed off the wrong way when others use those “ackshyually”.