• [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 hours ago

    From the reddit thread linked in the article:

    ZqjhYuyI5gWmgjx.jpg

    Image text:

    Degenerate_Media posted “you guys are fucking stupid, you know that?”

    dbrand replied: “yes”

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “They stated that the Companion Cube is Valve intellectual property, for which Dbrand does not have a license,” the post continues. "They requested we take down the product and launch film immediately. This was entirely within their rights, and they were direct, fair, and respectful throughout.

    "We took everything down and made an appeal. We asked Valve whether there was any way to keep the project alive: properly licensed, with their blessing, on their terms. They said no. Given our backwards approach of building first and asking permission later, it was a fair answer.

  • BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People will still get their companion-cube-steam-machine cases, they’ll need to print them instead, when the Steam Machines start arriving the STL files will show up.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think gaben is just sour that they didnt think of this and now theyre just pingu about it, missed opportunities and all

  • Durandal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You should always check with the IP owner first aside… this does seem like an uncharacteristic move from valve. Like… black mesa existed as a mod for a while… crickets. They remade it in a new engine… crickets. They put it on sale on steam… and valve endorsed it. afaik they never asked permission… but even if they did it’s weird to have a team doing a fully 3rd party remake of a core game and being fully endorsed by the company.

    But here you have someone well known, doing a skin essentially… that only works on the valve product… and valve has issue with THAT? odd.

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My guess would be that Valve had plans to make one themselves. Maybe as sort of a second gen or limited release thing.

      Maybe it’s also just not set a precedent. It is pretty crazy to make a product that uses such a famous piece of IP as a big company and not even asked for permission. It’s one thing if you’re like selling crafts on Etsy, but not even asking at that level is wild.

      • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If someone at Valve hadn’t at least mocked up one as a faceplate a long time ago, I’d be amazed. Dbrands over-engineered full case probably makes their version look real disappointing even if it is likely more technically sound.

        Realistically, it probably is the precedent, maybe combined with technical concerns like the thermals/RF/etc.

    • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The weirdest part to me is that this wasn’t a surprise. As soon as valve announced the steam machine it seemed the same day this was announced along with it. They knew it was coming. Why not say something then?

        • Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I mean how could they not be? It was being shared literally everywhere previously as soon as it was announced. Someone from Valve had to have seen it, especially when they found it immediately upon launch and shut it down almost instantly. It was obviously on their radar

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Valve has a history of hiring modders and making the mods official products (counter strike started as a Half Life mod). Black Mesa was originally a free mod, they then approached valve about selling it later, which Valve then approved. Had the devs not asked permission, Valve probably would’ve shut it down had they tried to sell it.

    • lastweakness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Black Mesa specifically did have Valve’s blessings. Valve did ask them to remove “Source” from the game’s title IIRC, but greenlit the release.

      • Durandal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That is my point though. The original mod just showed up and was being worked on for years. No word from valve. Then they rebuilt into a new engine and wanted to sell it… and I figured that valve would get upset… but no they just gave their blessing and put it on steam. AFAIK crowbar never asked to make the mod or the full rebuild and only talked to them after the fact… and valve was like “sure… go for it”. That’s why this felt oddly different.

        • lastweakness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Very different because Crowbar Collective never intended to commercialize Black Mesa until Valve reached out to them and suggested doing so. This was monetized from step 1. I imagine Valve’s reaction would have been different if this was just free files for 3D printing for example.

        • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          well, there’s a pretty big difference between a mod and a manufactured product for people to buy. They also did ask for permission before actually selling it, which is an important step

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    isn’t dbrand the guys who publically bragged about having “gotten ahold” of a pre-launch switch 2 and started showing peripherals before nintendo had even revealed it? it’s a pattern with them.

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I didn’t realize you had to get permission to make cases, so all those third party iphone cases have to have an agreement with apple?

    • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The issue isn’t making a 3rd-party case for Valve’s hardware, it’s making that case resemble an object whose image was created by and is owned by Valve. the fact that Valve both makes the hardware and owns the image is coincidental

      you can make an iPhone case without any issues from Apple, but you can’t make an iPhone case with images of Disney characters on it without permission from Disney

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, if they sport an Apple logo or any other IP not properly licensed.

      The exterior dimensions of a smartphone are not IP.

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They can make a case, but they can’t make a case that profits off of property and designs that are owned by valve, which the companion cube is. The normal process would be to reach out to valve and request a license to produce it. Dbrand didn’t do that, and valve told them to stop.

      Whether you agree with IP laws or not, this is how the laws currently function and dbrand has to know that. So this was a really stupid blunder for them to make.

      • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is the 2nd time they have done this in 5 years. First was ps5 cases in 2021. They changed the design enough to invalidate ip theft and relaunched.

        They absolutely know what they are doing.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Valve has revoked the license for a CSGO mod they greenlit years ago, how would you expect them to respond if you don’t get permission at all?