Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 20 hours agoDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1909
arrow-up1909imageDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 20 hours agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareCubitOom@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-218 hours agoPlease explain how more ram can cause a greater bottleneck then less ram of the same sku
minus-squareDpek@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·17 hours agoHave more ram then the cpu can address What worse bottleneck then not being able to boot? (If anyone has this problem i will gladly take the ram)
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 minutes agoI don’t think that results in a failure to boot. Not to mention 64bit addressable space is like 16 QB (though I’m not sure all bits have traces since we’re still orders of magnitude away from being able to use all those bits).
minus-squareptu@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoI guess bigger ram might have slower speeds and vice versa
Please explain how more ram can cause a greater bottleneck then less ram of the same sku
Have more ram then the cpu can address
What worse bottleneck then not being able to boot?
(If anyone has this problem i will gladly take the ram)
I don’t think that results in a failure to boot. Not to mention 64bit addressable space is like 16 QB (though I’m not sure all bits have traces since we’re still orders of magnitude away from being able to use all those bits).
I guess bigger ram might have slower speeds and vice versa
Not if they are the same sku