First you needed to create an account to view reviews on the IMDB website.

As of today, the same has now been implemented for the mobile app. So far it was excluded from the enshittification but fuck IMDB and fuck Amazon who own IMDB.

What is another good movie / series review app that does not need an anal probe to look at reviews?

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Love TMDB.

      The only downer is when someone posts a very right-wing coded review, there’s no blocking or reporting functionality, so it stands. I don’t care how ‘woke’ a person thinks something is. I want to hear a legit, constructive critique.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        You weren’t kidding. First review I bothered to read and it’s clearly the ramblings of a mentally ill fascist. If this is common they should remove reviews entirely, as crazies waging culture war will hinder adoption.

        “Masterpiece of reality” lol

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        The site is a web app. You can install it from your browser. It’s way better than IMDB and I’m not sure why it is so difficult to discover through search. Everyone should be using it.

          • Zarobi@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I love it when my app takes 8 seconds to load 120MB of JavaScript frameworks and CSS and images. It really gets me going, the anticipation

      • randompasta@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I almost always prefer the website to an app. Browsers loading a website have limited permissions on a phone vs an app.

        • Zarobi@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That’s why every fucking website has that annoying banner begging you to install their spyware app

      • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Comes in rightfully complaining about enshitification & then hits us with a wild curveball about preferring an app (which all but ensures you will need to login, yes connecting with your google / apple account is logging in).

        • stumu415@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I don’t know what apps you are using but besides my payment apps and Google play store, I have no other apps that require login if I just want to check out some reviews or basic information. TripAdvisor doesn’t need a login, booking.com doesn’t need a login to just to read reviews. Hell even Amazon itself doesn’t require a login if I want to read some book reviews.

          And I prefer an app because I can control the permissions instead of a website littered with cookies and trackers.

        • Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          i do too, but its still a bit conflicted since its owned by another studio

          Since January 2010, Rotten Tomatoes has been owned by Flixster, which was in turn acquired by Warner Bros. in 2011. In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes and its parent site Flixster were sold to Versant’s (then NBCUniversal’s) Fandango ticketing company.[10] Warner Bros. retained a minority stake in the merged entities, including Fandango.[

  • ruska@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    On a semi-related note, goodreads is also owned by Amazon. I’ve been using hardcover.app instead.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    A while back Amazon started requiring logins to view or search product reviews. (They show a very limited number without login.)

    Anyone who’s ever looked through Amazon reviews knows a huge number of them (and sometime the majority) are bullshit, but apparently that’s just fine with Amazon. They were able to completely shut down sites like fakespot.com with that one move so buyers are now on their own.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I knew they were limiting features for the purpose of increasing click through and time-engaged when they removed the role from an actor/actress’ Filmography.

    So if you’re watching a movie/show and you see a familiar face but can’t place it, now instead of seeing the role at under the piece of media, you have to click See all and then scroll to find it.

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Growing up with the internet, we were using IMDB as a way to win arguments or learn about shows. Back then, Wikipedia (or all those fandom wikis) didn’t exist. So IMDB was the top place.

    You saw a ridiculously gorgeous actor and wanted to creep on all their movies? IMDB.

    You wanted to know what Simpsons episode had Poochie the dog? IMDB.

    You wanted to know what people thought about the new characters in Lost Season 2? Yes, IMDB has forums.

    It started going to shit before Amazon bought it. It became an absolute pile of shit where doing any of those three things listed above was near impossible without ads or clicking a dozen places.

  • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The worst thing about it is that the actual insightful reviews are often hidden in the user reviews, while the rating and “featured” reviews often look quite biased or even manipulated in favor of the movie. Fuck imdb

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Actually… I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt there.

    With the entire internet flooded with abusive scrapers, putting text reviews behind a free login kinda makes sense. It’d dent bots and review manipulation programs, too, which are a huge issue on IMDB already.

    Not that IMDB isn’t enshittified. You should use other databases, but still.

    • lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve noticed this sort if thing becoming more common and I think it is very much related to bots scraping the web. I’m sure they’ll be happy to sell access to that data though.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yeah, I basically stopped using IMDb because it’s now useless. I’m not logging in.

    My taste is 3-5 star movies.

    The problem with IMDb is 80% of people rate movies on production quality. I like crappy movies, so production values are low and they lose a solid 4 stars. They’re not even b movies. But then there are “good” movies that utterly suck with awful plots and they get the same rating.

    So I have to look at 3 stars, use the user rating to see if anyone finds the movie good despite its flaws, then I click their profile and see if they have lists. Those are gold. (Once I found a list called “movies I worked on” and it was some person movie from junk to big budget films over the years. )

    Now that doesn’t work, so there’s no value.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Honestly you might find it more accurate to go by gut feeling/trailer or word of mouth. Imdb ratings are good for weeding out the truly bad ones, but for the rest it’s fairly unreliable. You can also see rotten tomatoes, but these days it feels very astroturfed and I haven’t really matched my rating with theirs for all but a couple movies that I saw. Letterboxd is better for user reviews but it’s very hivemind-y because popular opinion prevails kn their ratings.

  • waz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Which region?

    I haven’t seen this apart from an account pop up that can be dismissed so far in UK.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Letterboxd is pretty good, though it got bought by private equity a few years ago and they’re now trying to flog it off to Netflix or Paramount, so probably numbered days

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Letterboxd has been great for movie buffs but it has gained a mainstream crowd over the years and become less trustworthy with big titles and movies with celebrities that people have the hornies for.

      Still too bad to hear about these ambitions of making the big buck out of it.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t bother with ratings or reviews. If I think something might be good or interesting, I’ll watch it.