• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    How could that even be true since it was humans thay trained ai. What a dumb statement ahh

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ai can do plenty of classification tasks better than humans though. It’s not like every entity that trains another is fundamentally smarter.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah but to say humans can’t do this when humans doing it were what provided it the data is a dumb statement. Humans classified the data so that AI could learn you wouldnt say humans can’t classify data.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Software can’t tell truth from lies because software doesn’t even know what those are. It doesn’t know anything. It’s a parrot, a magic trick, a mirror to fool people (people like George Lucus) into thinking there’s another person looking a back at them.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Your comment seems irrelevant to the discussion.

            As opposed to your comment moving the goalposts from an AI doing something humans can’t, to them just being better than humans (which is absolutely arguable in most cases)?

          • Rothe@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The parameters set for classifying that are basically non-existant. So no, they can’t really do any of that. AI-bros will readily claim they can though, because it is like really important to them.