• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i mean, he was there all along. he pioneered the all green screen wave of automation in movies. the abuse of green screen was the slop before ai was around. to him it’s just cutting out all the vestiges of imperfection still greasing the machine

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    “Han shot first” dude is possibly the original slop author. But then his followers outslopped him.

    But also: of course AI is the future. It’s almost the current.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Goes to the Dark Side”

    Someone never saw the rerelease of the original series.

    Lucas’ best work was under an editor, whenever he got the full reigns, the product suffered.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “AI” may be the future, but right now, in the present, it feels like rape.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      It doesn’t seem coincidental that “AI are the future” people heavily imply nobody should resist it.

  • topperharlie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    yeah I’m not surprised, I watched the prequels. This guy was a legend in the 70s, that is like 50 years ago.

    He hasn’t done anything great since co-writing Willow 40 years ago. Go to his IMDB, he’s lived out of star wars nostalgia since then, and all of them after the initial trilogy was a downgrade.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You like what you like, but if you stan corporations enclosing our own culture and renting it back to us, that’s political.

    • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Its not political but he is an artist and that is why it is shocking Edit: OP first wrote: something along the lines of “why is it now seen as political”

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Does it? He certainly worked with a lot of talented artists, and I guess he did think of doing Hero’s Journey but in space.

            I’m not denigrating the art, but something about the popularity contest tastemaking rubs me the wrong way.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I would like to think that not every prestigious filmmaker is vulnerable to the AI propaganda, but

    What a condescending opener. Whatever you think of George Lucas, he’s made some cool stuff, he did it the old fashioned way, and he’s not constrained by resources. But rather than listen to what this guy has to say on the topic, he begins with the presumption that no, he must be deluded from swallowing propaganda.

    I’m hardly George Lucas’s biggest fan but this writer can blow me.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      49 minutes ago

      Nolan is an elitist asshole and his movies are not that great, actually. That is just him going “kids these days” like an old fart. He is all in on the IMAX scam. He insists on bad audio mixing (horrible even on theaters) hiding under the “I only mix for IMAX theaters” excuse. At least he acknowledges that it is Hollywood that is terribly out of touch with reality. Backrooms is successful because it connects with the audience nothing to do with whether it uses CGI or not (the Oppenheimer nuclear explosion scene is SO bad in an otherwise fine movie). And Backrooms was filmed on a regular digital 35mm Red camera at 1.85 ratio with regular Dolby Atmos and you can absolutely hear the dialogue. He might denounce AI slop but doesn’t realize that he’s also been using tech as a crutch to his creative shortcomings.

    • nevyn@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Journalism went out the window with satire. Now you just get to see which flavour of bullshit you end up with.