• Garbagio@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A) we don’t need infinite growth; what we need is a tapering down so we don’t end up with an entire generation spending their golden years in a ditch. B) As I’ve stated to another user, you’re equivocating. Stop that. We’ve had the same percentile decrease in the last 20 years as we did throughout the previous century; you’re looking at two different rates of decrease and calling them the same because they both happen to be decreases. That’s not how math works.

    • OryxAndCake@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Lmao, don’t worry about your pension, the water wars will get you long before you’re old enough to retire. Billions upon billions of us will die in the next 50 years.

      • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s more important to you to hold some personal sense of moral superiority than engage with the death of millions; your blasé attitude speaks volumes towards your privilege. I have no doubt that the reason you don’t want kids has far less to do with climate change than being able to say you won’t because of climate change.

        • OryxAndCake@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Did that make you feel better? I bet it did. Go on, let it all out. Tell me all the shitty things you’ve assumed about me because being angry at me is easier than accepting the world is ending.