• sicktriple@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Your comment just so happened to grasp my attention. There’s simply no need to resort to ad hominem.

    Is the BP oil spill my fault because I drive a car to work?

    • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Where is the ad hominem? If you’re going to pretend to speak Latin, at least know what the fucking words mean, you absolute potato.

      And in case it wasn’t clear, that was an example of ad hominem.

      • sicktriple@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The above commenter was calling into question my character because I had just created my account today. The definition of ad hominem I’m familar with:

        “Attacking a person’s character or motivations rather than a position or argument.”

        The commenter seems to imply that because I created my account recently, that my argument is therefore somehow not valid. I would consider that the be an attack on my character or motivation, rather than addressing my position. Would you agree or no? May have been a bit of an editorial stretch on my part, but it certainly doesn’t call for you actually calling me names and insulting me. I’m just here for some banter. Your comment is obviously malicious, and I think you’re better than that.

        Edit: yep, downvote and move on. Exactly what I thought. Classic potato behavior.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      All of us can try to take steps to reduce our fossil fuel use, either by trying to drive less, using public transport if available, or using an e-bike if viable. Individually the contribution is small, but collectively it can add up to help reduce demand, thus reducing the financial incentive to invest in oil or drill for more.

      • sicktriple@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Of course we can, but that’s not how history works. People do what they will do based on their conditioning and material conditions. Of course not always, but enough where we can derive conclusions. Scolding and finger wagging isn’t going to fix this problem. If you think one sliver of the population of Earth gives one single solitary fuck about reducing their carbon footprint, I have a bridge to sell you.

        Look, I respect you and your take, I’m not trying to be an asshole. I just genuinely don’t think your approach is a viable method of achieving what you’re saying.