• green_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    not defending youtube or ads in general, but technically the ad companies don’t pay unless the ad is viewed/served, or only pay depending on how much of the ad is viewed. they aren’t double dipping like this is implying.

    youtube is only getting paid if an ad is shown, and depending on the duration of the ad only for the duration of the ad that is shown to the end user. for like s skippable ad, for the first 30 seconds you can’t skip they get paid for that 30 seconds, but if ithe ad is longer say a minute, but the skip button appears after 30 and you press the skip button youtube only gets paid for the 30seconds the ad was displayed. if you don’t skip then they get paid for the amount of time the ad was shown.

    if you pay for youtube premium, then they don’t show ads, they don’t get paid for ads not shown. but that’s why you are giving them money. to compensate for the “lost revenue” they aren’t getting from ads.

    and for things like adblockers, the ads are not served therefore don’t qualify for being billed and youtube doesn’t get paid. and youtube pays channels based on performance of ads being displayed, and that’s why a lot of channels have both ad spots and sponsor segments. that and youtube doesn’t pay real good for ad revenue unless you are a huge channel.

    and then sponsor block skips sponsor sections for you and some sponsors/channels don’t care the contract was do a sponsor segment and those contracts are outside of youtube itself so youtube doesn’t get paid for them, that’s why there isn’t a sponsor skip action when you pay for premium. but i fear sponsors will corrupt and start doing contracts where they track how many times a segment was viewed and pay out based on that metric too.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    46 minutes ago

    Capitalism 101: cause a problem. Get paid for the solution.

    Also ignore any collateral or conscience.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I watched MST3K recently (a show that clearly denotes when classic network commercials would come on)

    They mentioned commercials AFTER YouTube had already shown a 1 minute ad break.

    We are late for a competitor.

      • green_link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        TV over the air had ads to pay for the TV shows and channels you watched because they couldn’t really secure the signal they sent out. but also it wasn’t really supposed to be secure in the first place. but TV production was expensive. so you got commercials, ads and sponsors when you watched.

        then cable TV came about. cable TV was supposed to be ad free because you were paying. but then they would have had to fill in for segments when over the air TV was showing ads so instead of that they just showed the same ads and got paid for it. that’s double dipping.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t pay and don’t get ads either. Stop being a sucker. Yes, I am fine with them going bankrupt if everyone would do that.