• wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Dude, I’m trying to learn German and those goddamn articles are so infuriating. I wonder how difficult it would be for there to be a linguistic reform to make it simpler

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Quite the statement for an English comment. English spelling is nonsensical and in desperate need of a major reform. RobWords even made the case for using runes again as it would probably fix a lot of issues already. The language simply isn’t made for Latin letters.

      But I don’t want to make this a sole whataboutism comment. Each language poses it’s own challenges. I will say that changing how roughly 100 million speak is easier said than done and would destroy a lot of culture. It would be much easier to force everyone to speak a different language entirely.

      Personally I don’t think it should or could be done at all. Unlike a spelling reform that English needs desperately and German had plenty of recently. There is nothing wrong with a language being complicated but there’s plenty wrong with arbitrary spelling if you ask me.

      • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        My native language isn’t English in case you were assuming that. I mention it because my native language has gone through a reform for the reasons of simplification. English may be shit, but it was much much easier to learn than the hell I am going through with German. Even Japanese, which I touched for a few years wasn’t nearly as bad. The point of languages it to be simple and efficient, and they should evolve to that goal eventually.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          54 minutes ago

          My native language isn’t English in case you were assuming that.

          I wasn’t assuming that, don’t worry. That’s why I phrased my message like that.

          I guess I agree to disagree here. Language is an expression of culture and heritage too. I would never speak German differently now just because of a reform. Neither would 99% of German speakers I assume. Yet we freely integrate English words into our language because it feels natural. These English words often come and go anyway so I’m not actually concerned the German language will become deluded from Internet lingo or anything.

      • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        Gendered nouns in German are just as stupid and arbitrary as spelling in English. Why is a pencil masculine? Why is beer neutral but coffee masculine? Why is school feminine?

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hebrew:

    the: prefix “ha” ה-‏

    in the: prefix “ba” ב-‏

    to the: prefix “la” ל-‏

    example:

    book: ספר sefer

    the book: הספר hasefer

    in the book: בספר basefer

    to the book: לספר lasefer

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t know about Russian but at least Croatian which is also a Slavic language confuses the hell out of me (and I’m German)

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Technically it’s the other way around - the ones German lost in comparison to Russian were the Instrumental and Prepositional (Locative).

        This is from the original 8 (or 9) cases in their ancestor, Proto-Indo-European: Nominative, Accusative, Instrumental, Dative, Ablative, Genitive, Locative, Vocative, (Allative).

    • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      confuses the hell out of me (and I’m German)

      And rightfully so. I’m also German, I learned Sorbian (slavic minority in Lusatia), and I can very much feel your pain.

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think it’s the case with most Slavic languages. My wife’s native tongue is Serbian, and knowinf when and how to use articles was one the hardest parts of learning English for her.

    • PostingInPublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And they aren’t clear when to use them either, it’s kinda cute when they look at you questioningly if they did correctly after formulating a sentence.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Neither does Polish. I know at least one polaka who confuses the/a(n) 15% of the time.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        One of my Polish colleagues, who otherwise speaks pretty perfect English, seems to choose he/she/it at random when putting sentences together. Which is fine for objects, but misleading for people. “I saw a friend yesterday and she said such-and-such” for a male friend, and so on.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Slavic languages notoriously have gender for every object. In russian “friend” have two variants, one for male gender, one for female. Same at least with Ukrainian and Serbian. So when I translate sentence to English (which only have one word for “friend”) I subconsciously use default word + she/he to empathize gender.

          It’s annoying habit, cause when I say or refer to “user” for example, I always assume it’s “he/him”.

          Guess same for your colleagues.

        • Dicska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          …which sounds surprising to me, because AFAIK Polish also has separate he/she words (on/ona).

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I assume he’s aligning the pronouns to the gender of the noun, rather than the person. “Susie is a great worker, he’s very efficient” kind of stuff.

  • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We don’t have an equivalent of a/an/the in lithuanian either =w= but we do have definite adjective forms, which is kind of like saying the, so there’s that