not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoauthenticity problemlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1706file-text
arrow-up1706imageauthenticity problemlemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square91fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 hour agoMy hot take. Apologies, but: Why do people think they’re walking AI detectors, soley based on the art itself? I find it pretentious. To be clear, the who, where, and how a piece is published is important context. One should be suspicious of suspicious artists. But not the what. Don’t even look at the piece. Extreme cases aside, no one can definitively tell if art is AI generated just by looking at it.
My hot take. Apologies, but:
Why do people think they’re walking AI detectors, soley based on the art itself?
I find it pretentious.
To be clear, the who, where, and how a piece is published is important context. One should be suspicious of suspicious artists.
But not the what.
Don’t even look at the piece. Extreme cases aside, no one can definitively tell if art is AI generated just by looking at it.