• Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How is more economical to pay for a build for a fossil fuel than to sell to yourself for a renewable.

    New levels of stupid.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Uh solar panels cost a bunch of money to make and they take a ton of space, which means buying extra land

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Solar panels are cheap these days and end up paying for themselves in cost savings. Especially when you own the factory that makes them.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s also good advertising. “We’ve powered this data centre with our solar panels, think of what it could power for you”.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They make them? They would likely have the lowest price per kwh achieveable in history given their size and current costs.

        The absolute size of their premises is also ridiculous.

        There is no way this is not a bad decision or else there is a political apect.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They literally own a company that makes them, can’t get cheaper than that.

        They’re doing this as a stunt for some stupid reason.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fossil fuel (just like crude oil) was formed via natural processes, so it’s accurate.

      I get what you’re saying though. It makes it sound happy and safe to use.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I love being in Canada and they routinely use terms like “clean natural gas”. Like wut?

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s only clean when you compare it to the fossil fuel alternatives it replaces like coal.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In case you’re unaware, that’s literally why they took to calling it that.

        Technically correct, easiest to market back when people were first starting to have doubts about setting stuff we found underground on fire.

        Using the word “natural” was very much a deliberate choice.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The term was useful back when we used coal gas. It stopped being useful 100 years ago.

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh Jesus Christ.

    This guy is just-- Not one word this guy (You know who!) says is true.

    Nothing he’s ever said is true.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      We’ll turn this into the worlds biggest racquetball facility before Elon ever makes it to mars.

  • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can we not legitimize these projects that will never fucking happen by reporting on them. I know the tech news places need clicks but this is not based in reality. My space tech proposal is that we all fart into jars and send the full jars to space-x for tax credits, where pure methane gas will produced. The rockets will have a pressurized 60KM long line attached to provide natural gas as a booster fuel, then detached to be caught an aircraft carrier. This will save big $$$.