• Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah, you don’t fuck with shit a person is that attached to because you think it “looks rough”

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Firstly, they’ll repair and/or make any guitar look better. It’s their job so they’ll do it. Secondly and more importantly, it isn’t about if the guitar is damaged or not. It was clearly loved for what it was, it was probably more about the history of it than anything else.
        It’s really not hard to not fuck with other peoples stuff without their consent. And it’s real sad that people like you exist that don’t seem to understand that.

      • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There’s not enough context here to say that with any certainty. If husband was playing it and enjoying it, then it’s doing the job it needs to. Even if it was actually broken and actually fixed, it still changes the relationship between player and instrument and could’ve easily taken away earned character as a way to make it look “nice”

        • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the idea of damage as character or lack of maintenance for a musical instrument as an aesthetic decision rather than just a bad decision, but you’re right about there not being enough information